BIRBAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(SC)-2002-1-7
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on January 07,2002

BIRBAL Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

STATE VS. RUPINDER KUMAR [LAWS(DLH)-2007-11-128] [REFERRED TO]
HATSUN AGRO PRODUCT LTD VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2008-9-166] [REFERRED TO]
SUKHBIR SINGH VS. STATE OF MP [LAWS(MPH)-2010-2-66] [REFERRED TO]
UMESH KUMAR VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2010-2-65] [REFERRED TO]
KEVAL KISHORE S/O CHIMANLAL VS. STATE OF M.P. THROUGH D.M., INDORE AND ANOTHER [LAWS(MPH)-2009-8-163] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)Appellant stands convicted under Section 16 (1) (a) (i) read with section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000. 00 The conviction and sentence were confirmed in appeal and the high Court did not interfere in revision.
(3.)The only point canvassed before us is that the sentence of imprisonment may be reduced to three months as permitted under the second proviso in section 16 (1) of the Act.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.