DELHI ADMINISTRATION Vs. MANOHAR LAL
LAWS(SC)-2002-8-50
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: DELHI)
Decided on August 29,2002

DELHI ADMINISTRATION Appellant
VERSUS
MANOHAR LAL Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

SUNIL KUMAR VERMA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(SC)-2015-9-89] [REFERRED TO]
SUNIL KUMAR VERMA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(SC)-2015-9-89] [REFERRED TO]
NOIDA ENTREPRENEURS ASSOCIATION VS. NOIDA [LAWS(SC)-2011-5-28] [REFERRED TO]
NOIDA ENTREPRENEURS ASSOCIATION VS. NOIDA [LAWS(SC)-2011-5-28] [REFERRED TO]
CHAMPION R. SANGMA VS. STATE OF MEGHALAYA [LAWS(MEGH)-2014-12-17] [REFERRED TO]
CHAMPION R. SANGMA VS. STATE OF MEGHALAYA [LAWS(MEGH)-2014-12-17] [REFERRED TO]
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD VS. MUKUND TRIAMBAK KAPRE [LAWS(MHCDRC)-2013-9-3] [REFERRED TO]
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD VS. MUKUND TRIAMBAK KAPRE [LAWS(MHCDRC)-2013-9-3] [REFERRED TO]
R. ANGAYARKANI VS. SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2017-1-234] [REFERRED TO]
R. ANGAYARKANI VS. SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2017-1-234] [REFERRED TO]
GEORGEKUTTY Y. VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2015-12-133] [REFERRED TO]
GEORGEKUTTY Y. VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2015-12-133] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KERALA VS. UNNI [LAWS(KER)-2012-12-232] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KERALA VS. UNNI [LAWS(KER)-2012-12-232] [REFERRED TO]
TUMAKURU CITY CORPORATION VS. TUMKURU POURA KARMIKARA SANGHA (REGD. ) [LAWS(KAR)-2022-12-116] [REFERRED TO]
TUMAKURU CITY CORPORATION VS. TUMKURU POURA KARMIKARA SANGHA (REGD. ) [LAWS(KAR)-2022-12-116] [REFERRED TO]
KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VS. YUSUF KHAN [LAWS(CAL)-2021-3-69] [REFERRED TO]
KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VS. YUSUF KHAN [LAWS(CAL)-2021-3-69] [REFERRED TO]
ABHAI RAM SAND VS. DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL [LAWS(ALL)-2003-9-222] [REFERRED TO]
SANDEEP PALACE GOPIGANJ BHADOHI VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2003-11-138] [REFERRED TO]
SANDEEP PALACE GOPIGANJ BHADOHI VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2003-11-138] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDRA KUMAR VS. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE [LAWS(ALL)-2004-10-129] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDRA KUMAR VS. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE [LAWS(ALL)-2004-10-129] [REFERRED TO]
ABHAI RAM SAND VS. DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL [LAWS(ALL)-2003-9-222] [REFERRED TO]
SUNITA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2023-7-628] [REFERRED TO]
SUNITA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2023-7-628] [REFERRED TO]
SUNITA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2023-7-628] [REFERRED TO]
SUNITA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2023-7-628] [REFERRED TO]
DELHI JAL BOARD VS. WORKMEN OF ERSTWHILE DELHI WATER SUPPLY [LAWS(DLH)-2006-2-155] [REFERRED TO]
DELHI JAL BOARD VS. WORKMEN OF ERSTWHILE DELHI WATER SUPPLY [LAWS(DLH)-2006-2-155] [REFERRED TO]
RAJA SINGH VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2019-1-299] [REFERRED TO]
RAJA SINGH VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2019-1-299] [REFERRED TO]
HARI OM VS. STATE [LAWS(ALL)-2019-1-316] [REFERRED TO]
HARI OM VS. STATE [LAWS(ALL)-2019-1-316] [REFERRED TO]
TRIDIB BHATTACHARJEE VS. RANJIT ROY [LAWS(CAL)-2003-7-14] [REFERRED TO]
TRIDIB BHATTACHARJEE VS. RANJIT ROY [LAWS(CAL)-2003-7-14] [REFERRED TO]
RAHUL S/O VIRENDRA DESHMUKH VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2016-5-72] [REFERRED TO]
RAHUL S/O VIRENDRA DESHMUKH VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2016-5-72] [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK VS. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF AESCULAPIUS REMEDIES LTD [LAWS(GJH)-2015-3-247] [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK VS. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF AESCULAPIUS REMEDIES LTD [LAWS(GJH)-2015-3-247] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. V. SRIHARAN @ MURUGAN [LAWS(SC)-2015-12-10] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. V. SRIHARAN @ MURUGAN [LAWS(SC)-2015-12-10] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. MOHAMMAD MUSLIM TAGALA [LAWS(SC)-2014-10-11] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. MOHAMMAD MUSLIM TAGALA [LAWS(SC)-2014-10-11] [REFERRED TO]
SHREE GANESH STEEL ROLLING MILLS LIMITED VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, (SEA PORT - APPRAISING GROUP); ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR-GENERAL, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE AND COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS [LAWS(MAD)-2005-7-245] [REFERRED]
SHREE GANESH STEEL ROLLING MILLS LIMITED VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, (SEA PORT - APPRAISING GROUP); ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR-GENERAL, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE AND COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS [LAWS(MAD)-2005-7-245] [REFERRED]
BHIM SINGH VERMA VS. YATENDRA KUMAR YADAV AND ORS. [LAWS(MEGH)-2015-8-7] [REFERRED TO]
BHIM SINGH VERMA VS. YATENDRA KUMAR YADAV AND ORS. [LAWS(MEGH)-2015-8-7] [REFERRED TO]
UPPER LALHA COOP. AGRICULTURE SERVICE SOCIETY LTD. VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2012-11-27] [REFERRED TO]
UPPER LALHA COOP. AGRICULTURE SERVICE SOCIETY LTD. VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2012-11-27] [REFERRED TO]
B S THAKUR VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2012-3-9] [REFERRED TO]
B S THAKUR VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2012-3-9] [REFERRED TO]
DEVARAJ VS. DAYARATHINI MAJOR [LAWS(KAR)-2020-3-124] [REFERRED TO]
DEVARAJ VS. DAYARATHINI MAJOR [LAWS(KAR)-2020-3-124] [REFERRED TO]
SATTE OF KERALA VS. UNNI [LAWS(KER)-2012-12-245] [REFERRED TO]
SATTE OF KERALA VS. UNNI [LAWS(KER)-2012-12-245] [REFERRED TO]
RAJIV KUMAR VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ANR. [LAWS(SC)-2017-8-66] [REFERRED TO]
RAJIV KUMAR VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ANR. [LAWS(SC)-2017-8-66] [REFERRED TO]
SURYA PRAKASH PANDEY VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-8-437] [REFERRED TO]
SURYA PRAKASH PANDEY VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-8-437] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UP VS. SUNIL KUMAR VERMA [LAWS(ALL)-2010-7-12] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UP VS. SUNIL KUMAR VERMA [LAWS(ALL)-2010-7-12] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UP VS. SUNIL KUMAR VERMA [LAWS(ALL)-2010-7-12] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UP VS. SUNIL KUMAR VERMA [LAWS(ALL)-2010-7-12] [REFERRED TO]
AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. NAFISHA BEGUM [LAWS(ALL)-2019-7-110] [REFERRED TO]
AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. NAFISHA BEGUM [LAWS(ALL)-2019-7-110] [REFERRED TO]
RASHTRIYA KISAN MAZDOOR SANGATHAN (REGD) THRU CONVENOR VS. STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER [LAWS(ALL)-2017-3-46] [REFERRED TO]
RASHTRIYA KISAN MAZDOOR SANGATHAN (REGD) THRU CONVENOR VS. STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER [LAWS(ALL)-2017-3-46] [REFERRED TO]
OM PRAKASH VS. DAKSHINANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAMLTD [LAWS(ALL)-2006-5-218] [REFERRED TO]
OM PRAKASH VS. DAKSHINANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAMLTD [LAWS(ALL)-2006-5-218] [REFERRED TO]
AJEET SINGH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [LAWS(ALL)-2006-7-107] [REFERRED TO]
AJEET SINGH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [LAWS(ALL)-2006-7-107] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDRA PAL MISHRA SRI CHANDRA SHEKHAR MISHRA VS. ETAH DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD [LAWS(ALL)-2004-3-253] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDRA PAL MISHRA SRI CHANDRA SHEKHAR MISHRA VS. ETAH DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD [LAWS(ALL)-2004-3-253] [REFERRED TO]
MODI INDUSTRIES LTD VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2004-5-68] [REFERRED TO]
MODI INDUSTRIES LTD VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2004-5-68] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P VS. SANJAY KUMAR PANDEY [LAWS(ALL)-2004-8-193] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P VS. SANJAY KUMAR PANDEY [LAWS(ALL)-2004-8-193] [REFERRED TO]
TARUN CHANDRA DEY VS. STATE OF TRIPURA [LAWS(GAU)-2003-1-8] [REFERRED TO]
TARUN CHANDRA DEY VS. STATE OF TRIPURA [LAWS(GAU)-2003-1-8] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. RAJENDRA PRASAD [LAWS(ALL)-2003-10-182] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. RAJENDRA PRASAD [LAWS(ALL)-2003-10-182] [REFERRED TO]
M/S JAIPRAKASH-GAYATRI JOINT VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2017-11-28] [REFERRED TO]
M/S JAIPRAKASH-GAYATRI JOINT VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2017-11-28] [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY SALIAR MAHAJANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOLS ARUPPUKOTTAI VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT VS. G SUBBURAJ [LAWS(MAD)-2004-12-42] [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY SALIAR MAHAJANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOLS ARUPPUKOTTAI VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT VS. G SUBBURAJ [LAWS(MAD)-2004-12-42] [REFERRED TO]
S NALINI VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2008-9-195] [REFERRED TO]
S NALINI VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2008-9-195] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHAND PRASHER VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH SECRETARY [LAWS(HPH)-2012-8-76] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHAND PRASHER VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH SECRETARY [LAWS(HPH)-2012-8-76] [REFERRED TO]
BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY VS. PALITANA SUGAR MILL PRIVATE LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2002-12-93] [REFERRED TO]
BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY VS. PALITANA SUGAR MILL PRIVATE LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2002-12-93] [REFERRED TO]
VEER SINGH KOTHARI VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(ORI)-2008-9-3] [REFERRED TO]
VEER SINGH KOTHARI VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(ORI)-2008-9-3] [REFERRED TO]
MADANLAL VS. BHANWARLAL [LAWS(RAJ)-2003-1-23] [REFERRED TO]
MADANLAL VS. BHANWARLAL [LAWS(RAJ)-2003-1-23] [REFERRED TO]
PROMUK HOFFMAN INTERNATIONAL LTD VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2008-8-24] [REFERRED TO]
PROMUK HOFFMAN INTERNATIONAL LTD VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2008-8-24] [REFERRED TO]
ROHIDAS S/O NAKALIRAM DULGACH VS. NANDED-WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(BOM)-2019-8-178] [REFERRED TO]
ROHIDAS S/O NAKALIRAM DULGACH VS. NANDED-WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(BOM)-2019-8-178] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN BANK VS. TECHNO FUTURA INTERNATIONAL LTD. [LAWS(DR)-2006-3-14] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN BANK VS. TECHNO FUTURA INTERNATIONAL LTD. [LAWS(DR)-2006-3-14] [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES VS. AKOLA JANTA COMMERCIAL CO.OPERATIVE BANK LTD [LAWS(BOM)-2022-7-17] [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES VS. AKOLA JANTA COMMERCIAL CO.OPERATIVE BANK LTD [LAWS(BOM)-2022-7-17] [REFERRED TO]
GOLAP CHAND PRASAD GUPTA VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2004-6-14] [REFERRED TO]
GOLAP CHAND PRASAD GUPTA VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2004-6-14] [REFERRED TO]
PREM CHANDRA MISHRA VS. IIND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE ETAH [LAWS(ALL)-2008-9-16] [REFERRED TO]
PREM CHANDRA MISHRA VS. IIND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE ETAH [LAWS(ALL)-2008-9-16] [REFERRED TO]
CHHATRAPAL SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2003-9-193] [REFERRED TO]
CHHATRAPAL SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2003-9-193] [REFERRED TO]
IFCI LTD VS. O L OF GUJARAT INJECT LTD [LAWS(GJH)-2015-3-248] [REFERRED TO]
IFCI LTD VS. O L OF GUJARAT INJECT LTD [LAWS(GJH)-2015-3-248] [REFERRED TO]
DHAJBEER SINGH RAWAT VS. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND [LAWS(UTN)-2022-7-100] [REFERRED TO]
DHAJBEER SINGH RAWAT VS. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND [LAWS(UTN)-2022-7-100] [REFERRED TO]
CHAUHAN ISHWARBHAI DUDHABHAI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2004-7-76] [REFERRED TO]
CHAUHAN ISHWARBHAI DUDHABHAI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2004-7-76] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHANDRA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2014-5-139] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHANDRA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2014-5-139] [REFERRED TO]
STATE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI VS. PREM RAJ [LAWS(SC)-2003-8-103] [REFERRED]
STATE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI VS. PREM RAJ [LAWS(SC)-2003-8-103] [REFERRED]
SUDHIR KUMAR BAJPAI AND ORS. VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-12-82] [REFERRED TO]
SUDHIR KUMAR BAJPAI AND ORS. VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-12-82] [REFERRED TO]
BODHISATWA SAMAJ SEVA SANSTHAN U.P. AND ORS. VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-11-49] [REFERRED TO]
BODHISATWA SAMAJ SEVA SANSTHAN U.P. AND ORS. VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-11-49] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY KUMAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2013-1-231] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY KUMAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2013-1-231] [REFERRED TO]
K.M. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, MURIYA GHATAMPUR, KANPUR NAGAR AND ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-7-175] [REFERRED TO]
K.M. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, MURIYA GHATAMPUR, KANPUR NAGAR AND ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-7-175] [REFERRED TO]
U S SINHA DR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2003-7-20] [REFERRED TO]
U S SINHA DR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2003-7-20] [REFERRED TO]
NAGARATHNA ALIAS RATHNA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2009-1-43] [REFERRED TO]
NAGARATHNA ALIAS RATHNA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2009-1-43] [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY - INDIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY & 1 VS. MANOJ AMBARAM KAHAR & 1 [LAWS(GJH)-2014-3-184] [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY - INDIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY & 1 VS. MANOJ AMBARAM KAHAR & 1 [LAWS(GJH)-2014-3-184] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LTD VS. WORKMAN INDIAN DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LTD [LAWS(SC)-2006-11-112] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LTD VS. WORKMAN INDIAN DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LTD [LAWS(SC)-2006-11-112] [REFERRED TO]
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VS. MADHO SINGH [LAWS(RAJ)-2003-9-4] [REFERRED TO]
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VS. MADHO SINGH [LAWS(RAJ)-2003-9-4] [REFERRED TO]
M SARAVANAKUMAR VS. SECRETARY TO GOVT EDUCATION DEPARTMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2005-7-96] [REFERRED TO]
M SARAVANAKUMAR VS. SECRETARY TO GOVT EDUCATION DEPARTMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2005-7-96] [REFERRED TO]
MUTHIRAM PARAMBATH HARIDAS VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2003-1-9] [REFERRED TO]
MUTHIRAM PARAMBATH HARIDAS VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2003-1-9] [REFERRED TO]
Gordhan Singh VS. Abdulji Alamji [LAWS(MPH)-2005-1-134] [REFERRED TO]
Gordhan Singh VS. Abdulji Alamji [LAWS(MPH)-2005-1-134] [REFERRED TO]
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD VS. SANJEEV BALKRISHNA SHIRSAT [LAWS(MHCDRC)-2013-12-10] [REFERRED TO]
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD VS. SANJEEV BALKRISHNA SHIRSAT [LAWS(MHCDRC)-2013-12-10] [REFERRED TO]
RAKESH KUMAR VS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2005-11-34] [REFERRED TO]
RAKESH KUMAR VS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2005-11-34] [REFERRED TO]
ASSTT. CIT VS. NORMA DETERGENT (PVT.) LTD. [LAWS(GJH)-2016-2-91] [REFERRED TO]
ASSTT. CIT VS. NORMA DETERGENT (PVT.) LTD. [LAWS(GJH)-2016-2-91] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. SWAPNA ROY [LAWS(ALL)-2010-5-330] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. SWAPNA ROY [LAWS(ALL)-2010-5-330] [REFERRED TO]
JIBAN KUMAR GHOSH VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2009-11-19] [REFERRED TO]
JIBAN KUMAR GHOSH VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2009-11-19] [REFERRED TO]
ANSAL HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION LTD VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2004-7-37] [REFERRED TO]
ANSAL HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION LTD VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2004-7-37] [REFERRED TO]
AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LIMITED VS. RAJEEV DAGA [LAWS(CAL)-2013-12-11] [REFERRED TO]
AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LIMITED VS. RAJEEV DAGA [LAWS(CAL)-2013-12-11] [REFERRED TO]
B. VENKATESWARLU VS. GOVERNMENT OF A.P. [LAWS(APH)-2014-3-3] [REFERRED TO]
B. VENKATESWARLU VS. GOVERNMENT OF A.P. [LAWS(APH)-2014-3-3] [REFERRED TO]
LOGIX BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITED VS. STATE OF U.P [LAWS(ALL)-2022-8-25] [REFERRED TO]
LOGIX BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITED VS. STATE OF U.P [LAWS(ALL)-2022-8-25] [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION VS. TUSHR WELFARE SOCIETY [LAWS(DLH)-2005-12-31] [RELIED ON]
RAVINDER KUMAR VS. DIRECTOR, AIIMS [LAWS(DLH)-2005-12-161] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDER KUMAR VS. DIRECTOR, AIIMS [LAWS(DLH)-2005-12-161] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. MURARAO MALOJIRAO GHORPADE [LAWS(BOM)-2009-10-34] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. MURARAO MALOJIRAO GHORPADE [LAWS(BOM)-2009-10-34] [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION VS. TUSHR WELFARE SOCIETY [LAWS(DLH)-2005-12-31] [RELIED ON]
RAKESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA VS. CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT [LAWS(ALL)-2012-7-327] [REFERRED TO]
RAKESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA VS. CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT [LAWS(ALL)-2012-7-327] [REFERRED TO]
SHYAM DEV VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2013-1-90] [REFERRED TO]
SHYAM DEV VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2013-1-90] [REFERRED TO]
KRIPA SHANKER VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2018-12-214] [REFERRED TO]
KRIPA SHANKER VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2018-12-214] [REFERRED TO]
R.L. SRIVASTAVA VS. SAM HIGINBOTTOM INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURE AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2016-4-46] [REFERRED TO]
R.L. SRIVASTAVA VS. SAM HIGINBOTTOM INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURE AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2016-4-46] [REFERRED TO]
RAJEEV KUMAR VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2019-9-195] [REFERRED TO]
RAJEEV KUMAR VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2019-9-195] [REFERRED TO]
SOMARU PRASAD. VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2019-1-260] [REFERRED TO]
SOMARU PRASAD. VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2019-1-260] [REFERRED TO]
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD VS. SINDHUBAI KONDIRAM DARWANTE [LAWS(BOM)-2010-3-119] [REFERRED TO [ 9 ]]
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD VS. SINDHUBAI KONDIRAM DARWANTE [LAWS(BOM)-2010-3-119] [REFERRED TO [ 9 ]]
LT.COL.(MRS.) SAROJ MAHANTA VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2003-4-304] [REFERRED TO]
LT.COL.(MRS.) SAROJ MAHANTA VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2003-4-304] [REFERRED TO]
REKHA VS. PRAMOD KUMAR [LAWS(RAJ)-2003-2-22] [REFERRED TO]
REKHA VS. PRAMOD KUMAR [LAWS(RAJ)-2003-2-22] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL SALAM VS. MAHARANA PRATAP UNIVERSITY & ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2004-2-62] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL SALAM VS. MAHARANA PRATAP UNIVERSITY & ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2004-2-62] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., CHENNAI VS. P. SHYAMALA [LAWS(MAD)-2017-1-303] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., CHENNAI VS. P. SHYAMALA [LAWS(MAD)-2017-1-303] [REFERRED TO]
BEAUTY SYIEMLIEH AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. [LAWS(MEGH)-2015-7-9] [REFERRED TO]
BEAUTY SYIEMLIEH AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. [LAWS(MEGH)-2015-7-9] [REFERRED TO]
RAMCHANDRA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2021-9-37] [REFERRED TO]
RAMCHANDRA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2021-9-37] [REFERRED TO]
RAVIKANT DATTATRAY CHANDPURE VS. SURESH SHANKAR AHIRE [LAWS(BOM)-2006-10-33] [REFERRED TO]
RAVIKANT DATTATRAY CHANDPURE VS. SURESH SHANKAR AHIRE [LAWS(BOM)-2006-10-33] [REFERRED TO]
TAPARIA OVERSEAS P LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(BOM)-2003-1-107] [REFERRED TO]
TAPARIA OVERSEAS P LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(BOM)-2003-1-107] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION [LAWS(DLH)-2012-7-159] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION [LAWS(DLH)-2012-7-159] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT COKING COAL LTD KOYLA VS. DLF POWER LIMITED AND JHARKHAND [LAWS(ET)-2012-2-14] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT COKING COAL LTD KOYLA VS. DLF POWER LIMITED AND JHARKHAND [LAWS(ET)-2012-2-14] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. JAIPRAKASH-GAYATRI JOINT VENTURE VS. STATE OF A.P. [LAWS(APH)-2017-10-6] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. JAIPRAKASH-GAYATRI JOINT VENTURE VS. STATE OF A.P. [LAWS(APH)-2017-10-6] [REFERRED TO]
A. MUTHYALA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. [LAWS(APH)-2018-2-56] [REFERRED TO]
A. MUTHYALA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. [LAWS(APH)-2018-2-56] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHNA RICE MILLS VS. RECOVERY OFFICER DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD [LAWS(ALL)-2003-8-204] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHNA RICE MILLS VS. RECOVERY OFFICER DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD [LAWS(ALL)-2003-8-204] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA TYAGI VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-11-51] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA TYAGI VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-11-51] [REFERRED TO]
AJOULI BRAHAMANA AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SERVICE SOCIETY LTD. VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2013-1-72] [REFERRED TO]
AJOULI BRAHAMANA AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SERVICE SOCIETY LTD. VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2013-1-72] [REFERRED TO]
MATEHAR CO-OPERATIVE SERVICE SOCIETY LTD. VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2012-11-24] [REFERRED TO]
MATEHAR CO-OPERATIVE SERVICE SOCIETY LTD. VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2012-11-24] [REFERRED TO]
PRAJAPATI HITESH MOHANLAL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2016-7-235] [REFERRED TO]
PRAJAPATI HITESH MOHANLAL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2016-7-235] [REFERRED TO]
S.A. MIYAJAN VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MAD)-2014-2-1] [REFERRED TO]
S.A. MIYAJAN VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MAD)-2014-2-1] [REFERRED TO]
KESHAV DEV VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2005-5-31] [REFERRED TO]
KESHAV DEV VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2005-5-31] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD SHAHBAJ ALAM VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2020-10-37] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD SHAHBAJ ALAM VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2020-10-37] [REFERRED TO]
ROOPAKALA PRASAD VS. UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION [LAWS(KER)-2012-12-103] [REFERRED TO]
ROOPAKALA PRASAD VS. UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION [LAWS(KER)-2012-12-103] [REFERRED TO]
USHAM IBOTOMBI SINGH VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(MANIP)-2013-5-12] [REFERRED TO]
USHAM IBOTOMBI SINGH VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(MANIP)-2013-5-12] [REFERRED TO]
SUNITA DEVI VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2021-9-8] [REFERRED TO]
SUNITA DEVI VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2021-9-8] [REFERRED TO]
ROHIDAS VS. NANDED [LAWS(BOM)-2019-8-258] [REFERRED TO]
ROHIDAS VS. NANDED [LAWS(BOM)-2019-8-258] [REFERRED TO]
PRADIP KR JAIN VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2006-6-27] [REFERRED TO]
PRADIP KR JAIN VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2006-6-27] [REFERRED TO]
PRIYANKA OVERSEAS PVT LTD VS. J AND K BANK LTD [LAWS(J&K)-2009-6-5] [REFERRED TO]
PRIYANKA OVERSEAS PVT LTD VS. J AND K BANK LTD [LAWS(J&K)-2009-6-5] [REFERRED TO]
HOLIRAM BORDOLOI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GAU)-2015-12-44] [REFERRED TO]
HOLIRAM BORDOLOI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GAU)-2015-12-44] [REFERRED TO]
C I T III VS. BARODA PEOPLES CO OP BANK LTD [LAWS(GJH)-2005-8-49] [REFERRED TO]
C I T III VS. BARODA PEOPLES CO OP BANK LTD [LAWS(GJH)-2005-8-49] [REFERRED TO]
ITC LIMITED VS. CC APPEALS AND CE [LAWS(ALL)-2003-10-157] [REFERRED TO]
ITC LIMITED VS. CC APPEALS AND CE [LAWS(ALL)-2003-10-157] [REFERRED TO]
TRIBHUWAN NATH SRIVASTAVA VS. CHAIRMAN and MANAGING DIRECTOR INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK CONTROL OFFICE CHENNAI [LAWS(ALL)-2003-9-30] [REFERRED TO]
TRIBHUWAN NATH SRIVASTAVA VS. CHAIRMAN and MANAGING DIRECTOR INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK CONTROL OFFICE CHENNAI [LAWS(ALL)-2003-9-30] [REFERRED TO]
UPENDRA KUMAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2003-9-150] [REFERRED TO]
UPENDRA KUMAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2003-9-150] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P VS. U P MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA PARISHAD SHRAMIK SANGH [LAWS(ALL)-2003-9-172] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P VS. U P MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA PARISHAD SHRAMIK SANGH [LAWS(ALL)-2003-9-172] [REFERRED TO]
KESARI DEVI VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2005-8-185] [REFERRED TO]
KESARI DEVI VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2005-8-185] [REFERRED TO]
MORIROKU UT INDIA PVT LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2005-9-13] [REFERRED TO]
MORIROKU UT INDIA PVT LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2005-9-13] [REFERRED TO]
NALINI AND ASSOCIATES VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2004-2-24] [REFERRED TO]
NALINI AND ASSOCIATES VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2004-2-24] [REFERRED TO]
BAISHALI HOM CHAUDHURI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-2009-7-47] [REFERRED TO]
BAISHALI HOM CHAUDHURI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-2009-7-47] [REFERRED TO]
SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2020-5-46] [REFERRED TO]
SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2020-5-46] [REFERRED TO]
SARDAR SURJEET SINGH VS. SURESH CHANDRA PORWAL [LAWS(ALL)-2014-3-233] [REFERRED TO]
SARDAR SURJEET SINGH VS. SURESH CHANDRA PORWAL [LAWS(ALL)-2014-3-233] [REFERRED TO]
B F DITTIA VS. APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY [LAWS(APH)-2008-8-28] [REFERRED TO]
B F DITTIA VS. APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY [LAWS(APH)-2008-8-28] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P VS. JEET S BISHT [LAWS(SC)-2007-5-148] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P VS. JEET S BISHT [LAWS(SC)-2007-5-148] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

D. Raju, J. - (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)The respondent has been convicted for an offence under Section 16 read with Section 7 for the violation of Section 2 (ia) (a), (i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') by the Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi, on 9-5-2000 in case No.42 of 1994. Thereupon, on 12-5-2000 he was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year, in addition to a fine of Rs. 2000/-, in default of payment of which to undergo a further sentence of simple imprisonment for one month. Thereafter, the respondent went on appeal and the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi, by his judgment dated 20-3-2001 in Crl. Appeal No.11 of 2000 affirmed the findings of the trial court that the offence has been properly proved on the basis of proper and sufficient material and consequently sustained the conviction. So far as the question of sentence is concerned, adverting to the claim made for the benefit of Section 433 (d) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Appellate Judge found it not possible for him to grant relief on the view that the power to commute under the said provision vests with the State Government and it was not permissible for him to adopt the course made in 1996 (2) FAC 187 by this Court, in exercise of its inherent powers. The sentence imposed by the trial court was also, thus, confirmed.
(3.)Aggrieved, the respondent pursued the matter on revision before the High Court in Crl. Revision Petition No.188 of 2001. The conviction of the respondent was not challenged by the respondent before the High Court. So far as the sentence is concerned, adverting to the certificate of the Director, Central Food Laboratory, wherein it was found stated that the colouring matter was not injuries to health and placing reliance upon the decision of this Court reported in 2000 Crl L.J. 2777, wherein a direction was issued by this Court to the Government under Section 433 Cr. P.C., benefit of Section 433 (d) Cr. P.C. was claimed for the respondent. Taking into account the same and the concession said to have been made by the counsel for the State, the learned Judge in the High Court felt persuaded to extend the benefit of commutation of sentence, as envisaged under Section 433 (d) Cr.P.C. and directed the respondent the deposit in the trial court Rs. 20,000/- as fine, in commutation of the sentence of imprisonment and inform the Government of such deposit, for formalising the matter by passing appropriate orders under Section 433 (d) Cr. P.C. It was also ordered that on deposit of the fine amount, the sentence of imprisonment imposed shall stand suspended. Aggrieved against this order of the High Court dated 24-4-2001, this appeal has been filed by the Delhi Administration.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.