J M BISWAS Vs. N K BHATTACHARJEE
LAWS(SC)-2002-4-134
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: CALCUTTA)
Decided on April 02,2002

J.M.BISWAS Appellant
VERSUS
N.K.BHATTACHARJEE Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

RAM DHANI TIWARI VS. RAMPUKAR TIWARY [LAWS(PAT)-2012-12-7] [REFERRED TO]
THIRU. K.PALANISWAMY VS. THIRU O.PANNEERSELVAM [LAWS(MAD)-2022-9-50] [REFERRED TO]
MUKESH CHOUDHARY VS. TULSIRAM SILAWAT [LAWS(MPH)-2022-9-56] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK KUMAR VS. KALI PRASAD [LAWS(PAT)-2010-9-54] [REFERRED TO]
SOUTHERN RAILWAY LABOUR UNION VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(KER)-2004-7-28] [REFERRED TO]
SHIPPING CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED VS. MACHADO BROTHERS [LAWS(SC)-2004-3-55] [REFERRED TO]
PAWAN SINGH VS. TULSIRAM SILAWAT [LAWS(MPH)-2022-9-89] [REFERRED TO]
SITARAM CHOUDHARY VS. INDUSTRIAL COURT CHHATTISGARH RAIPUR [LAWS(CHH)-2019-1-282] [REFERRED TO]
MUDALIAR EDUCATIONAL TRUST VS. N.M. SUNDARAR [LAWS(MAD)-2021-7-278] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

D. P. Mohapatra, J. - (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)The litigation giving rise to the present appeal relates to affairs of the South Eastern Railway Mens' Union (hereinafter referred to as 'the Union') with membership of 1,34,000 railway employees spread over six States covering the South Eastern Railway Zone. Though the appellant as well as respondent No. 1 have ceased to be office-bearers of the Union, the litigation initiated at a point of time when they were members of the Union still continues.
(3.)This appeal, filed by the defendant, is directed against the revisional order passed by the Calcutta High Court in C.O. No. 2264/99 in which the High Court declined to interfere with the order of temporary injunction passed on 17th August, 1999 by the Additional District Judge, 3rd Court, Alipore, in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 179/99 arising out of the Title Suit No. 105/98 on the file of the 6th Civil Judge (Senior Division), Alipore, South Calcutta.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.