UNION OF INDIA Vs. HANSOLI DEVI
LAWS(SC)-2002-9-87
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on September 12,2002

Union of India and Ors. Appellant
VERSUS
Hansoli Devi And Ors. Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

K.V. SARADA VS. THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR, THALASSERY [LAWS(KER)-2016-2-107] [REFERRED TO]
K.V. SARADA VS. THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR, THALASSERY [LAWS(KER)-2016-2-107] [REFERRED TO]
N.K. PAVITHRAN AND ORS. VS. M. NANDAKUMAR AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-10-52] [REFERRED TO]
VINAY KUMAR KOHLI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MPH)-2002-1-1] [REFERRED TO]
G MUTHU VS. TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION MADURAI LTD [LAWS(MAD)-2006-8-229] [REFERRED TO]
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER VS. LAXMANBABU GAYAKWAD [LAWS(KAR)-2006-11-52] [REFERRED TO]
J. ALEX PONSEELAN VS. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE [LAWS(MAD)-2013-11-32] [REFERRED TO]
SYNERGY FERTICHEM PVT.LTD VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2019-12-96] [REFERRED TO]
SHYAMALA VS. DISTRICT COLLECTOR [LAWS(KER)-2021-7-143] [REFERRED TO]
BIR WATI & ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. [LAWS(SC)-2017-8-82] [REFERRED TO]
SHARMA TRANSPORTS VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(SC)-2011-8-56] [REFERRED TO]
TARA CHAND AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2015-2-106] [REFERRED TO]
INDERJIT SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(P&H)-2020-1-44] [REFERRED TO]
KALLIANIKUTTY AMMA VS. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR LA [LAWS(KER)-2003-1-70] [REFERRED TO]
K PUSHPARAJ VS. K MANOHARAN [LAWS(KER)-2006-5-4] [REFERRED TO]
KALAWATI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2004-4-87] [REFERRED TO]
SRIKUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2021-3-36] [REFERRED TO]
H.P. Housing & Urban VS. Santosh Kumar [LAWS(HPH)-2009-6-19] [REFERRED TO]
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD VS. MANURA & ORS [LAWS(DLH)-2015-2-646] [REFERRED]
CO OPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES UNION SINDHUDURG VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2003-9-103] [REFERRED TO]
VIJU VS. SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA [LAWS(BOM)-2005-3-110] [REFERRED TO]
PANDHARINATH S O PUNJA POLADE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2005-7-121] [REFERRED TO]
SHRIKRISHNA SITARAMAJI FANDE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2007-10-172] [REFERRED TO]
PRABHUDAS DAMODAR KOTECHA VS. MANHARBALA JERAM DAMODAR [LAWS(BOM)-2007-7-49] [REFERRED TO]
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER CSEB BILASPUR DIVISION VS. PUBLIC UTILITY PERMANENT LOK ADALAT, BILASPUR [LAWS(CHH)-2011-4-76] [REFERRED TO]
RICHARD YIMTO VS. STATE OF NAGALAND [LAWS(GAU)-2002-12-36] [REFERRED TO]
KOMMISETTY NAMMALWAR AND CO VS. AGRICULTURE MARKET COMMITTEE [LAWS(APH)-2009-5-9] [REFERRED TO]
DISTRICT COLLECTOR KAKINADA VS. P NAGABHUSHANA RAO [LAWS(APH)-2003-9-1] [REFERRED TO]
MD MAQDOOM AHMED VS. SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION INDUSTRIES NAMPALLY HYDERABAD [LAWS(APH)-2003-7-130] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD VS. M/S TRIVENI SHEETS GLASS WORKS LTD, ALLAHABAD [LAWS(ALL)-2013-12-31] [REFERRED TO]
DEBDAS BANERJEE VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2013-11-60] [REFERRED TO]
REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES VS. KAMAL INFOSYS LTD [LAWS(ALL)-2003-10-181] [REFERRED TO]
JAI VIR SINGH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [LAWS(ALL)-2007-11-128] [REFERRED TO]
NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOIDA) VS. YUNUS [LAWS(SC)-2022-2-12] [REFERRED TO]
JAGARAN PRAKASHAN LIMITED AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. [LAWS(PAT)-2019-9-188] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. JOGINDER PATJOSHI [LAWS(SC)-2003-11-43] [REFERRED TO]
JALANDHAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(SC)-2002-11-108] [REFERRED]
NARMADESHWAR PRASAD SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2004-4-107] [REFERRED TO]
CHENNAMMA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2014-10-195] [REFERRED TO]
LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE AND WD/O. MADHUSUDAN DALSUKHRAM BHATT VS. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER [LAWS(GJH)-2017-3-97] [REFERRED TO]
JAYANTIBHAI RAMANBHAI PATEL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2020-10-320] [REFERRED TO]
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER VS. LOKESH REDDY [LAWS(KAR)-2003-4-5] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MP VS. RAJESH SHARMA [LAWS(MPH)-2017-8-71] [REFERRED TO]
PARAMESWARAN PILLAI VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2014-6-169] [REFERRED TO]
N VENKATRAMANI VS. INDIAN BANK [LAWS(MAD)-2005-7-225] [REFERRED TO]
ABRAHAM KURIAKOSE VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2003-5-30] [REFERRED TO]
E V KRISHNA KUTTY S O VALAMBATH VS. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR LAND ACQUISITION [LAWS(KER)-2003-8-1] [REFERRED TO]
MANSUKH ALIAS RAVJI GORASIYA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2021-4-12] [REFERRED TO]
ARDESHIR B. CURSETJEE AND SONS LTD. VS. INLAND WATERWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR. [LAWS(DLH)-2010-10-240] [REFERRED TO]
VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS. COLLECTOR, BULDHANA, DISTRICT BULDHANA [LAWS(BOM)-2021-1-17] [REFERRED TO]
SUVARN RAJARAM BANDEKAR DISCRETIONARY TRUST VS. ADVOCATE SUNIFER CARDOZO [LAWS(BOM)-2018-5-55] [REFERRED TO]
FAROOK SHAIKH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2013-5-31] [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE MEMBER VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2005-11-51] [REFERRED TO]
PREM PAL SINGH VS. STATE OF U. P. [LAWS(ALL)-2022-8-141] [REFERRED TO]
RATNAGIRI JILLAH SAHAKARI BANK KARMACHARI SANGH VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2003-7-122] [REFERRED TO]
ANNASAHEB TULSIRAM KHARAT VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2017-2-92] [REFERRED TO]
A EKAMBARA NAICKER VS. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CUM REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER SUB COLLECTORS OFFICE MADANAPALLE CHITTOOR DISTRICT [LAWS(APH)-2003-2-15] [REFERRED TO]
GREATSHIP (INDIA) LTD. VS. COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX AND ORS. [LAWS(BOM)-2015-4-135] [REFERRED TO]
ZAINABI VS. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER [LAWS(KAR)-2013-4-60] [REFERRED TO]
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD VS. POONAM & ORS [LAWS(DLH)-2015-1-629] [REFERRED]
Ojas Industries P LTD VS. UOI [LAWS(DLH)-2005-12-102] [REFERRED TO]
ALEMBIC PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED VS. CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY [LAWS(GJH)-2013-11-26] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT BHOGILAL PATEL VS. LEITZ TOOLING SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE [LAWS(BOM)-2019-6-345] [REFERRED TO]
PREMCHAND S/O NATHU PATIL VS. STATE OF MAHARAHSTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2019-5-4] [REFERRED TO]
GATEWAY TERMINALS (I) PVT. LTD. VS. COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., RAIGAD [LAWS(CE)-2015-3-78] [REFERRED TO]
AMIR CHAND SINGLA VS. LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR SOUTH WEST [LAWS(DLH)-2010-12-263] [REFERRED TO]
DAGU GANPAT KATHE VS. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER [LAWS(BOM)-2004-7-48] [REFERRED TO]
JAVED VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2009-2-175] [REFERRED TO]
RAMAPATI VS. COLLECTOR [LAWS(ALL)-2003-12-147] [REFERRED TO]
U P SECONDARY EDUCATION SERVICE SELECTION BOARD VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-1-124] [REFERRED TO]
RAIJIBHAI BHIKHABHAI PARMAR VS. INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS CORPORATION LIMITED (NOW - RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED) AND ORS. [LAWS(GJH)-2016-1-117] [REFERRED TO]
ANTONY VS. COMPETENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(MAD)-2008-4-21] [REFERRED TO]
ALEMBIC PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED VS. CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY [LAWS(GJH)-2013-7-548] [REFERRED TO]
MANUBHAI HARGOVANBHAI JOSHI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2013-8-27] [REFERRED TO]
RAMACHANDRAN PANAKAM VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(KER)-2021-10-3] [REFERRED TO]
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER RAILWAYS AND KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD VS. MUNIYAPPA [LAWS(KAR)-2007-9-79] [REFERRED TO]
MATHU G VS. MANAGMENT OF TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPN MADURAI LTD [LAWS(MAD)-2006-8-295] [REFERRED TO]
BIJESH KUMAR M VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2020-12-13] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF.M.P [LAWS(MPH)-2021-8-8] [REFERRED TO]
JABALPUR BUS OPERATORS ASSOCIATION VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2002-12-33] [REFERRED TO]
MAHARSHI MAHESH YOGI VEDIC VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(SC)-2013-7-48] [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(SC)-2010-4-103] [REFERRED TO]
KENDRIYA KARAMCHARI SEHKARI GREH NIRMAN SAMITI LTD VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(SC)-2008-11-13] [REFERRED TO]
RAGHUNATH RAI BAREJA VS. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK [LAWS(SC)-2006-12-72] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY SINGH VS. U P PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ALLAHABAD [LAWS(SC)-2007-1-9] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. ANJANA SEHGAL [LAWS(P&H)-2011-3-298] [REFERRED TO]
BINA DEVI WIFE OF SRI VINAY KUMAR SINGH VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY [LAWS(PAT)-2017-11-9] [REFERRED TO]
MATILAL BHOWMIK AND ORS. VS. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(TRIP)-2015-7-42] [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD VS. PRAKASHO DEVI [LAWS(DLH)-2015-3-561] [REFERRED TO]
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD VS. REETA MISHRA [LAWS(DLH)-2015-2-583] [REFERRED TO]
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD VS. WARISH AHMED & ORS [LAWS(DLH)-2015-2-647] [REFERRED]
PRATI SHAILESH PATEL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2016-8-40] [REFERRED TO]
RAMSINGBHAI (RAMSANGBHAI) JERAMBHAI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER [LAWS(GJH)-2014-8-306] [REFERRED TO]
ZAIREMTHANGA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF MIZORAM AND ORS. [LAWS(GAU)-2015-11-103] [REFERRED TO]
ALLAUDDIN VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. [LAWS(BOM)-2015-3-14] [REFERRED TO]
VIJAYA DEORAO NANDANWAR VS. CHIEF OFFICER MUNICIPAL COUNCIL [LAWS(BOM)-2013-7-208] [REFERRED TO]. 4.]
PUNJA NARAYAN POLADE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2005-7-56] [REFERRED TO]
ABHIJIT DEY VS. LEARNED WEST BENGAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL [LAWS(CAL)-2006-3-41] [REFERRED TO]
ZAHRUDDIN AHMED VS. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER [LAWS(APH)-2008-8-66] [REFERRED TO]
BADRALA SURYAKUMARI VS. BADRALA VAMANA MURTHY [LAWS(APH)-2010-4-113] [REFERRED TO]
P NAGESWARA RAO VS. GOVT OF A P [LAWS(APH)-2008-8-61] [REFERRED TO]
SMT. RADHIKA BHARGAVA VS. DR. ARJUN SAHAGAL [LAWS(BOM)-2019-1-56] [REFERRED TO]
S.KASI VS. STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SAMAYNALLUR POLICE STATION MADURAI DISTRICT [LAWS(SC)-2020-6-20] [REFERRED TO]
PROMOTERS ALIAS BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF PUNE VS. PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(SC)-2007-5-68] [REFERRED TO]
STATE VS. MOTTAIYANDI CHETTIAR (DIED) [LAWS(MAD)-2016-11-120] [REFERRED TO]
UCCHATAR MADHYAMIK SCHOOL VS. STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2017-8-194] [REFERRED TO]
RAJ KUMAR MAZUMDAR VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2021-10-26] [REFERRED TO]
PUSPA RANJAN SAHOO VS. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(ORI)-2012-7-9] [REFERRED TO]
H.P.HOUSING BOARD VS. RAM KARAN [LAWS(HPH)-2008-10-15] [REFERRED TO]
MUNIYAPPA VS. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION [LAWS(KAR)-2011-11-33] [REFERRED TO]
R Krishnamurthy VS. Indian Institute of Technology [LAWS(MAD)-2003-10-39] [REFERRED TO]
Southern Railways VS. S Palaniappan [LAWS(MAD)-2005-3-153] [REFERRED TO]
SHAJITHA VS. AKBAR [LAWS(KER)-2023-7-175] [REFERRED TO]
N RAVINDRA MURTHY VS. SHRI VEERABHADRA SWAMY TEMPLE [LAWS(APH)-2008-3-19] [REFERRED TO]
PUSALA MURALI KRISHNA VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT [LAWS(APH)-2008-3-27] [REFERRED TO]
BHARTIBEN SHAH VS. GRACY THOMAS [LAWS(BOM)-2013-1-84] [REFERRED TO]
ANATH NATH NASKAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-2013-2-108] [REFERRED TO]
GAURAV MISHRA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2010-12-61] [REFERRED TO]
BANSAL WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR. VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2010-5-346] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. BHANUDAS MARUTI KADAKNE [LAWS(BOM)-2006-3-99] [REFERRED TO]
JASPAL SINGH VS. O P BABBAR [LAWS(DLH)-2008-2-22] [REFERRED TO]
PARAMOUNT LIMITED VS. ION EXCHANGE (INDIA) LIMITED [LAWS(BOM)-2023-8-327] [REFERRED TO]
CHCHANGUR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2007-4-182] [REFERRED TO]
BHANU PRATAP SINGH VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2007-8-80] [REFERRED TO]
H.P. HOUSING BOARD VS. RAM KARAN [LAWS(HPH)-2008-10-13] [REFERRED TO]
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD VS. VIJAY KUMAR & ORS [LAWS(DLH)-2015-1-630] [REFERRED]
AGRAWAL COLOUR ADVANCE PHOTO SYSTEM VS. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BHOPAL [LAWS(CE)-2010-5-121] [REFERRED TO]
PREM CHANDRA MISHRA VS. STATE OF U. P. [LAWS(ALL)-2022-12-110] [REFERRED TO]
KARAM CHAND VS. STATE OF H.P. [LAWS(HPH)-2014-5-68] [REFERRED TO]
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA 2, KOLKATA VS. V.N. ENTERPRISES LIMITED [LAWS(CAL)-2021-9-64] [REFERRED TO]
SWAPNIL GUPTA VS. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2022-12-167] [REFERRED TO]
VASANT GANPAT PADAVE VS. ANANT MAHADEV SAWANT [LAWS(SC)-2019-9-67] [REFERRED TO]
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION VS. KEY DEE COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD [LAWS(SC)-2022-5-80] [REFERRED TO]
MUKESH RAO VS. HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2012-12-74] [REFERRED TO]
KAN SINGH VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2021-3-61] [REFERRED TO]
NORASIA LINES MALTA LTD VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(KER)-2005-6-64] [REFERRED TO]
BANSAL WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(SC)-2011-4-107] [REFERRED TO]
RAMJEET BIND VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2006-2-39] [REFERRED TO]
RAMJEET BIND AND JAGDISH BIND BOTH SONS VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2006-1-125] [REFERRED TO]
GIRISH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2007-4-192] [REFERERD TO]
GUTHALA SESHAGIRI RAO VS. COLLECTOR [LAWS(APH)-2008-6-102] [REFERRED TO]
SARWOTTAM ISPAT (P) LIMITED, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE, VS. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITED [LAWS(APH)-2004-2-145] [REFERRED]
SHITAL SUDHIR SONAVLE VS. GROUP GRAM PANCHAYAT [LAWS(BOM)-2003-4-50] [REFERRED TO]
TUKARAM S O MOTIRAM KURHADE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2003-6-137] [REFERRED TO]
JAVED SHEIKH MUSTAQUE PATEL VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2009-3-213] [REFERRED TO]
H. S. ARUN KUMAR VS. STATE OF GOA [LAWS(BOM)-2022-11-98] [REFERRED TO]
PAINTERIOR (INDIA) VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2017-7-266] [REFERRED TO]
PRAMILA M. AND ORS. VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2015-11-307] [REFERRED TO]
DYAMANNA VS. ASST COMMISSIONER/ LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER [LAWS(KAR)-2019-3-436] [REFERRED TO]
BABY DEB VS. AJIT DEB [LAWS(GAU)-2007-10-11] [REFERRED TO]
REGISTRAR GENERAL VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GAU)-2013-9-49] [REFERRED TO]
CCE VS. GTC INDUSTRIES LTD. [LAWS(CE)-2008-9-243] [REFERRED TO]
SUSHIL KUMAR DUBEY VS. STATE OF U. P. [LAWS(ALL)-2023-1-88] [REFERRED TO]
KALAWATILAL CHAND GUPTA SHIV GENERAL FINANCE P LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2004-3-3] [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL BOARD OF DAWOODI BOHRA COMMUNITY VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(SC)-2004-12-90] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS. ANINDYA SUNDAR DAS [LAWS(SC)-2022-10-5] [REFERRED TO]
KODAR SINGH VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2014-3-49] [REFERRED TO]
SHANTI DEVI VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2019-11-381] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR VS. KARNAIL SINGH AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2017-1-259] [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB STATE THROUGH COLLECTOR VS. DARA SINGH [LAWS(P&H)-2017-1-384] [REFERRED TO]
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER VS. SRI. UTTARESWAR MAHAPRABHU [LAWS(ORI)-2005-8-45] [REFERRED TO]
MANGILAL VS. DISTRICT TRADE AND INDUSTRIES [LAWS(MPH)-2020-5-86] [REFERRED TO]
RAJU VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2020-12-9] [REFERRED TO]
VISHNUVARDHAN PAPER MILLS (P) LTD VS. TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD [LAWS(MAD)-2011-11-492] [REFERRED]
BHOPAL SINGH VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2003-1-178] [REFERRED TO]
ANNAMMA VARGHESE VS. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) (NH) KOTTAYAM [LAWS(KER)-2013-8-140] [REFERRED TO]
PRAMODKUMAR ANAND MISHRA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2014-12-101] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. SHAMBHUBHAI MAHADEV AHIR [LAWS(GJH)-2014-3-54] [REFERRED TO]
VIJAY DAMJI DANGER VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2020-10-469] [REFERRED TO]
B PREMANAND VS. MOHAN KOIKAL [LAWS(SC)-2011-3-100] [RELIED UPON [PARA 27] 18.]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – III VS. M/S. CALCUTTA KNITWEARS, LUDHIANA [LAWS(SC)-2014-3-66] [REFERRED TO]
MADHYA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS. MOHD. SHAHBUDDIN [LAWS(MPH)-2022-4-60] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF TRIPURA VS. ROOPCHAND DAS [LAWS(SC)-2002-12-113] [REFERRED TO]
SOHAN LAL VS. SWARAN KAUR [LAWS(P&H)-2003-5-147] [REFERRED TO]
MD ALAMGIR VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2013-7-78] [REFERRED TO]
Land Acquisition Officer VS. Uttareswar Mahaprabhu [LAWS(ORI)-2007-8-43] [REFERRED TO]
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT UKP AND THE STATE VS. LAKSHMANBABU GAYAKWAD [LAWS(KAR)-2006-11-73] [REFERRED TO]
K.SADASIVAN VS. SURENDRADAS [LAWS(KER)-2020-10-191] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF TAMILNADU, REP BY JOINT COMMISSIONER (CT) VS. TVL BARON POWER LTD [LAWS(MAD)-2017-11-274] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. HARBANS LAL [LAWS(HPH)-2013-9-14] [REFERRED TO]
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER VS. JAYALAKSHMI [LAWS(MAD)-2014-11-473] [REFERRED TO]
MANAGING DIRECTOR UTTAR PRADESH INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE [LAWS(ALL)-2005-3-81] [REFERRED TO]
Vijay Shanker Rai VS. State of U.P. and Ors. [LAWS(ALL)-2009-9-88] [REFERRED TO]
AKULA NARAYANA SWAMY VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2003-3-115] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRAKANT JAGANNATH GHODKE VS. COMMISSIONER FOR CO OPERATION and REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES [LAWS(BOM)-2003-4-41] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD VS. ANIL NOEL RODRIGUES [LAWS(BOM)-2004-11-37] [REFERRED TO]
BHOWANIPORE GUJARATI EDUCATION SOCIETY VS. KOLKATA MINICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(CAL)-2008-9-46] [REFERRED TO]
AMAR NATH PRAMANICK VS. SANJIB DAS GUPTA [LAWS(CAL)-2008-2-89] [REFERRED TO]
JAHARLAL SAHA VS. PRADIP SAHA [LAWS(CAL)-2005-11-35] [REFERRED TO]
SHAIKH MOIN SHAIKH MEHMOOD VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2020-9-77] [REFERRED TO]
HINDUSTAN COCA-COLA BEVERAGES (P.) LTD. VS. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE [LAWS(CE)-2009-5-160] [REFERRED TO]
MAMTA A GHODASARA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2011-2-134] [REFERRED TO]
NEW INDIA ASSURANE CO LTD VS. ARTI DEVI & ORS [LAWS(DLH)-2015-2-648] [REFERRED]
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD VS. NARESH KUMAR & ORS [LAWS(DLH)-2015-3-644] [REFERRED]
Dr.Y.S.PARMAR UNIVERSITY VS. STATE OF H.P. [LAWS(HPH)-2003-7-29] [REFERRED TO]
AYUSHI VS. DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY AND ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2015-7-178] [REFERRED TO]
PROGOTI BORA VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2002-11-13] [REFERRED TO]
SINGH CYCLE STORE A PARTNERSHIP FIRM VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2020-10-59] [REFERRED TO]
SMT. Y. SARVAMANGALAMMA VS. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, & LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KOPPAL, DISTRICT KOPPAL AND OTHERS [LAWS(KAR)-2013-6-181] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESHCHANDRA VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2014-3-20] [REFERRED TO]
SURAZ INDIA TRUST VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2011-4-49] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHNAN VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(SC)-2013-5-22] [REFERRED TO]
V RAMAKRISHNA RAO VS. SINGARENI COLLIERIES COMPANY [LAWS(SC)-2010-10-33] [REFERRED TO]
NEMAI CHANDRA KUMAR (D) THR. LRS VS. MANI SQUARE LTD [LAWS(SC)-2022-7-91] [REFERRED TO]
MANGE RAM VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2005-5-47] [REFERRED TO]
RAMPHAL SINGH AND OTHERS VS. LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR [LAWS(P&H)-2013-8-396] [REFERRED TO]
SONEX AUTO INDUSTRIES P. LIMITED VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2014-7-783] [REFERRED TO]
HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED VS. SHANTI [LAWS(P&H)-2021-9-90] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. VISHNUVARDHAN PAPER MILLS (P) LTD., PALANI ROAD, SWAMINATHAPURAM, MADATHUKULAM-642 113, DINDIGUL, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER R.S. SAMPATHNEHRU VS. TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, 800, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-600002, [LAWS(MAD)-2011-11-340] [REFERRED TO]
DISTRICT COLLECTOR VS. MUHAMMED KUNHI [LAWS(KER)-2012-9-388] [REFERRED TO]
JAYDEEP GUPTA VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2011-8-26] [REFERRED]
PURUSHAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2004-11-58] [REFERRED TO]
DR V K RAJAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2007-11-61] [REFERRED TO]
THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR VS. FABWORTH PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. & ORS [LAWS(CAL)-2016-6-109] [REFERRED TO]
UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS. SUNITA ARORA & ANR [LAWS(DLH)-2015-4-535] [REFERRED]
AJENDRAPRASAD NARENDRAPRASAD VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2006-4-2] [REFERRED TO]
BHAICHANDBHAI DHARMA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2008-1-235] [REFERRED TO]
AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. VS. C.S.T., DELHI [LAWS(CE)-2015-5-7] [REFERRED TO]
ZILE SINGH VS. STATE GNCT OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2013-12-121] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV VS. DELHI RACE CLUB (1940) LTD. [LAWS(DLH)-2014-11-350] [REFERRED TO]
SUMIT KUMAR SHAW VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2021-2-1] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. SADASHIV GANPAT AVHAD [LAWS(BOM)-2008-1-160] [REFERRED TO]
J SAI PRASANNA VS. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA [LAWS(APH)-2008-5-16] [REFERRED TO]
PAPPU VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2014-10-96] [REFERRED TO]
S.K. MEHROTRA VS. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(ALL)-2017-5-42] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

PER G. B. PATTANAIK, J. : - - (1.)In this bunch of cases, the provisions of Section 28 -A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), crop up for consideration. Two learned Judges of this Court, in course of hearing of Civil Appeal No. 9477 of 1994 (Union of India and Anr. v. Smt. Hansoli Devi and Ors.), formulated two questions to be answered by a Larger Bench. The said questions are:
"1.(a) Whether dismissal of an application seeking reference under Section 18 on the ground of delay amounts to "not filing an application" within the meaning of Section 28 -A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894?

(b) Whether a person whose application under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is dismissed on the ground of delay or any other technical ground is entitled to maintain an application under Section 28 -A of the Land Acquisition Act.?

2. Whether a person who has received the compensation without protest pursuant to the award of the land acquisition collector and has not filed an application seeking reference under Section 18 is "a person aggrieved" within the meaning of Section 28 -A -

(2.)According to the learned judges, the three - Judge bench decision of this Court in Jose Antonio Cruz Dos R. Rodriguese and Anr. v. Land Acquisition Collector and Another1 requires reconsideration. At the outset, it may be stated that the constitution bench in Pradip Chandra Parija and Ors. v. Pramod Chandra Patnaik and Ors.2, held that judicial discipline and propriety demands that a bench of two learned judges should follow a decision of a bench of three learned judges. But if a bench of two learned judges concludes that an earlier judgment of three learned judges is so very incorrect that in no circumstances can it be followed, the proper course for it to adopt is, to refer the matter before it to a bench of three learned judges setting out the reasons why it could not agree with the earlier judgment and then the bench of three learned judges also comes to the conclusion that the earlier judgment of a bench of three learned judges is incorrect, then a reference could be made to a bench of five learned judges. In view of the aforesaid constitution bench decision, the very reference itself made by the two learned judges was improper and we would have sent the matters to a bench of three learned judges for consideration. But since the questions involved are pending in many cases in different High Courts and certain doubts have arisen with regard to the interpretation to the provisions of Section 28 -A of the Act, we thought it appropriate to answer the two questions referred. Section 28 -A of the Land Acquisition Act reads thus :
"28 -A. Redetermination of the amount of compensation on the basis of the award of the court - (1) Where in an award under this part, the court allows to the applicant any amount of compensation in excess of the amount awarded by the collector under Section 11, the persons interested in all the other land covered by the same notification under Section 4, sub -section (1) and who are also aggrieved by the award of the collector may, notwithstanding that they had not made an application to the collector under Section 18, by written application to the collector within three months from the date of the award of the court require that the amount of compensation payable to them may be redetermined on the basis of the amount of compensation awarded by the court :

Provided that in computing the period of three months within which an application to the collector shall be made under this sub -section, the day on which the award was pronounced and the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the award shall be excluded.

(2) The collector shall, on receipt of an application under sub -section (1), conduct an inquiry after giving notice to all the persons interested and giving them a reasonable opportunity of being heard, and make an award determining the amount of compensation payable to the applicants.

(3) Any person who has not accepted the award under sub -section (2) may, by written application to the collector, require that the matter be referred by the collector for the determination of the court and the provisions of Sections 18 to 28 shall, so far as may be, apply to such reference as they apply to a reference under Section 18.

(3.)The aforesaid provision was inserted by way of an amendment by Act 68 of 1984, which came into force w.e.f. 24.9.1984. Prior to the present reference in Jose Antonio Cruz Dos R. Rodriguese and Anr. v. Land Acquisition Collector and Anr.1 two learned judges of this Court had referred the following two questions for being answered by a larger bench of five Judges. The said questions being :
"1. Whether the award of the court, i.e. civil court made under Section 26 on reference under Section 18 would also include judgment and decree of the appellate court under Section 54?

2. Whether each successive award or judgment and decree (if answer on question No. 1 is positive) would give cause of action to file application under Section 28 -A; if so construed, does not such a construction violate the language used in Section 28 -A when Parliament advisedly did not use such expressions -



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.