GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Vs. P VENKU REDDY
LAWS(SC)-2002-9-43
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: ANDHRA PRADESH)
Decided on September 23,2002

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH,GENERAL MANAGER DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED Appellant
VERSUS
P.VENKU REDDY Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

KARTHIKEYA VARMA VS. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-7-30] [REFERRED TO]
MANJIT SINGH BALI VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [LAWS(BOM)-2011-11-62] [REFERRED TO]
COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2004-2-213] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY BHULABHAI PATEL VS. PANKAJ VINODKUMAR PATNI [LAWS(GJH)-2022-8-1254] [REFERRED TO]
SUMITRA W/O PRABHAKAR THAKRE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2014-3-175] [REFERRED TO]
SHAIK IBRAHIM VS. STATE OF TELANGANA [LAWS(TLNG)-2019-3-17] [REFERRED TO]
THE JOINT REGISTRAR/ADMINISTRATOR, M/S. TIRUTHANI CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LIMITED VS. P. SIVA KUMAR [LAWS(MAD)-2014-11-58] [REFERRED TO]
J.A.MURUGAN VS. REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES [LAWS(MAD)-2020-3-230] [REFERRED TO]
M. SULFIKER VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2021-9-28] [REFERRED TO]
C.INDERNATH VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2022-6-236] [REFERRED TO]
RAMAKRISHNAN VS. ADDITIONAL LEGAL ADVISOR [LAWS(KER)-2021-1-29] [REFERRED TO]
STATE A C B ANANTAPUR RANGE VS. Y VENKATESWARLU [LAWS(APH)-2011-8-6] [REFERRED TO]
NUTHULAPATI NAGA BASWESHWER RAO S/O LATE SUBBA RAO VS. STATE OF TELANGANA REP BY ITS SPL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [LAWS(APH)-2018-10-8] [REFERRED TO]
SURESHKUMAR VALLABHDASJI JAJOO VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2004-9-166] [REFERRED TO]
R.E. KIL ROY ROCKY VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2020-2-140] [REFERRED TO]
SHAILESH RAMANLAL MAHIMTURA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2014-9-56] [REFERRED TO]
V.KRISHNAREDDY VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2022-8-503] [REFERRED TO]
BAYYAREDDY MANJUNTHA VS. STATE - ACB, WARANGAL RANGE, WARANGAL [LAWS(TLNG)-2018-10-33] [REFERRED TO]
MANJIT SINGH BALI VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [LAWS(BOM)-2010-11-50] [REFERRED TO]
BRIJLAL SADASUKH MODANI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2008-2-166] [REFERRED TO]
RAVURI SIVA PRASAD VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2013-7-13] [REFERRED TO]
RAVURI SIVA PRASAD VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2013-7-13] [REFERRED TO]
HANUMAN PRASAD KACHHAWA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-2-398] [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. P.G. JAIN [LAWS(SC)-2016-4-70] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDER KUMAR VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2016-11-30] [REFERRED TO]
SUDARSHA AVASTHI VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2006-6-55] [REFERRED TO]
MAHBUBUR RAHMAN VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [LAWS(GAU)-2022-9-82] [REFERRED TO]
SAT PAUL VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2006-3-48] [REFERRED TO]
JERUSALEM MATHAI, HYDERABAD VS. STATE OF TELANGANA [LAWS(APH)-2016-6-94] [REFERRED TO]
M S RAJPUT VS. STATE OF CHHATISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2005-2-4] [REFERRED TO]
RAKESH DHAR TRIPATHI VS. STATE OF U P & 3 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-8-123] [REFERRED]
ANUP KUMAR GOND VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [LAWS(BOM)-2019-7-370] [REFERRED TO]
MANIK VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2020-3-197] [REFERRED TO]
J S BINDRA VS. C B I CHANDIGARH [LAWS(P&H)-2004-8-13] [REFERRED TO]
K. SUBRAMANIAN VS. STATE [LAWS(MAD)-2021-4-180] [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION BANK SECURITIES AND FRAUD CELL VS. RAMESH GELLI [LAWS(SC)-2016-2-100] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. RAMESHWAR [LAWS(SC)-2009-4-65] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. VS. BRIJLAL SADASUKH MODANI [LAWS(SC)-2015-12-68] [REFERRED TO]
G.S.JAYAMOHAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2021-9-179] [REFERRED TO]
S KOMARAIAH VS. STATE [LAWS(APH)-2003-3-114] [REFERRED TO]
SADASHIV KRISHNA SUTAR VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2013-5-56] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

Dharmadhikari, J. - (1.)Special Leave to appeal is granted.
(2.)The learned counsel appearing for the parties are heard finally on merits of the case.
(3.)Government of Andhra Pradesh and District Co-operative Central Bank Limited, Nellore, through its General Manager, have preferred this appeal challenging the Order dated 26-9-2001 of the Division Bench of High Court of Andhra Pradesh whereby criminal case instituted against the respondent/accused, who was working as Supervisor in the District Co-operative Central Bank Limited, Nellore, for alleged offence of accepting bribe punishable under provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short 'the 1988 Act') has been quashed in proceedings under S. 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (for short 'Cr. P.C.)


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.