JUDGEMENT
Venkataramiah, J. -
(1.) The question which arises for consideration in this appeal by special leave is whether under Section 52 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) the Central Government is bound to accept in satisfaction of the whole or any part of the duty payable under the Act at such price as may be agreed upon between the Central Government and the person accountable for estate duty any property passing on the death of the deceased when an application is made for that purpose by such person.
(2.) On the death of Lala Beni Madho Agarwal which took place on September 29, 1964 his son Prayag Dass Agarwal, the respondent herein filed a statement of account under the Act of the estate passing on the death of the deceased. The estate duty payable in respect of the estate in question was determined at Rs. 3,37,543.40 by the Assistant Controller of Estate Duty, Allahabad by his order dated November 30, 1970. When the appeal filed against the said order was still pending, the respondent made an application under Section 52 (1) of the Act on February 16, 1971 to the Central Board of Direct Taxes offering one of the items of property passing on the death of the deceased, namely premises No. 1, Phaphamau Road, Allahabad, whose principal value had been determined by the Assistant Controller at Rs. 2.53,625/- in part payment of the balance of estate duty which was still payable by him under the order of assessment. The said application elicited a cryptic reply dated Sept. 16, 1971 from the Under Secretary of the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the relevant part of which read as follows:-
"I am directed to refer to your petition dated 16-2-1971 on the subject mentioned above and to say that your offer is not acceptable."
(3.) The Assistant Controller, however, wrote to the respondent on October 21, 1971 stating that the respondent could pay the arrears of estate duty payable by him in monthly instalments of Rupees 10,000/- each beginning from October 29, 1971 subject to payment of interest @ 9% per annum on the arrears outstanding. Thereupon the respondent filed a writ petition before the High Court of Allahabad under Article 226 of the Constitution against the Assistant Controller, the Central Board of Direct Taxes and the Union of India requesting the High Court to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus to the Union of India to consider the application made by him under Section 52 (1) on its merits, to negotiate and settle the price of the property offered by him in settlement of part of duty payable by him and to give credit to the extent of the price so determined under the Act. The respondent contended inter alia that Section 52 of the Act conferred a right on an accountable person, if he chose to do so, to offer an item of property passing on the death of the deceased in respect of whose estate, duty was payable under the Act in discharge of the whole or part of such duty and that it imposed a reciprocal obligation on the Central Government to accept such property and adjust its price as may be agreed upon between the Central Government and the accountable person towards the duty payable. He further contended that the Central Government had no right to refuse to accept the offer so made by the accountable person and that he having made the offer to pay the duty by transfer of the property in question he could not be compelled to pay the duty to the extent of its price. He, therefore, prayed for the issue of appropriate directions to the Central Government to comply with Section 52 of the Act accordingly.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.