SEWAKRAM SOBHANI Vs. R K KARANJIA CHIEF EDITOR WEEKLY BLITZ
LAWS(SC)-1981-5-2
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: MADHYA PRADESH)
Decided on May 01,1981

SEWAKRAM SOBHANI Appellant
VERSUS
R K KARANJIA,CHIEF EDITOR,WEEKLY BLITZ Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) This appeal, by special leave, is directed against an order of the M. P. High Court dated Apr. 15, 1978, quashing the prosecution of the respondent, R. K. Karanjiya, Chief Editor, Blitz, for an offence under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code for publication of a news-item in that paper which was per se defamatory, on the ground that he was protected under Ninth Exception to Section 499 of the Code.
(2.) During the period of Emergency the appellant, who is a senior lawyer practising at Bhopal, was placed under detention under Section 3 (1) (a) (ii) of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 and was lodged in the Central Jail, Bhopal. There were several other detenus belonging to the opposition parties lodged along with him in the same jail, including three lady detenues, viz., Smt. Uma Shukla, Smt. Ramkali Misra, Advocate and Smt. Savitha Bajpai, later State Minister, Public Works Department. The husband of Smt. Uma Shukla, a practising advocate at Bhopal, was not detained. Smt. Shukla was released on parole for a week between June 10 and 18, 1976. On her return to the jail it was found that she had conceived. She was examined on July 30, 1976, by a lady doctor, Dr. (Mrs.) N. C. Srivastava, Woman Asst. Surgeon and the pregnancy was reported to be six weeks old. Smt. Shukla was again released on parole in the month of August 1976 and on August 24, 1976, she got the pregnancy terminated by Dr. (Mrs) Upadhayay at the Zanana Hamidia Hospital, Bhopal with the written consent of her husband under Sec. 3 of the Medical (Termination of Pregnancy) Act, 1976.
(3.) While the order of detention of the appellant was still in operation, there was an ex parte confidential enquiry held by Shri S. R. Sharma, I. A. S. Deputy Secretary (Home) Government of Madhya Pradesh, into the circumstances leading to the pregnancy of Smt. Shukla. The Enquiry Officer by his report dated November 3, 1976, apparently held that the pregnancy was due to illicit relations between the appellant and Smt. Shukla, during their detention in the Central Jail. On December 25, 1976, the Blitz, in its three editions in English, Hindi and Urdu simultaneously flashed a summary of the report and the story as given out was that (i) there was a mixing of male and female detenus in the Central Jail, Bhopal, (ii) the appellant had the opportunity and access to mix with Smt. Shukla freely, and (iii) Smt. Shukla became pregnant through the appellant. The news-item was per se defamatory. It is somewhat surprising that the Enquiry Report, which was a document of highly confidential nature, should have found its way to the press.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.