SIVAYOGESWARA COTTON PRESS DEVANGERE Vs. M PANCHAKSHARAPPA
LAWS(SC)-1961-9-24
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: KARNATAKA)
Decided on September 27,1961

SIVAYOGESWARA COTTON PRESS,DEVANGERE Appellant
VERSUS
M.PANCHAKSHARAPPA Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

MULSHANKER SOMNATH VS. AGENT BHARATKHAND TEXTILE MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED [LAWS(GJH)-1965-3-5] [REFERRED]
NAROTTAMDAS TRIKAMDAS TOPRANI VS. TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF BOMBAY [LAWS(BOM)-1999-9-45] [REFERRED TO]
JAGAN NATH VS. HANS RAJ [LAWS(HPH)-1997-1-2] [REFERRED]
DHRANGADHRA CHEMICALS WORKS LTD VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2012-11-15] [REFERRED TO]
RUDRAVVA AND ORS. VS. SUMA AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2014-7-347] [REFERRED TO]
MOHINDER PAL SINGH KHURANA VS. MODI ALAKALIES AND CHEMICALS LTD [LAWS(DLH)-2010-7-375] [REFERRED TO]
ATYAM VEERRAJU VS. PECHETTI VENKANNA [LAWS(SC)-1965-9-15] [REFERRED 9 ('65) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 598 OF 1963,D/-11-8-1965 (SC),PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION V. RAM D]
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD VS. KAREM ZAHEER YAR JUNG [LAWS(APH)-1997-4-102] [REFERRED TO]
VISHWANATH GANU DABOLKAR VS. ANANT B NAIK [LAWS(BOM)-2018-6-70] [REFERRED TO]
ROHIT DHANKARD VS. SANDHYA GUPTA [LAWS(DLH)-2020-1-93] [REFERRED TO]
BAJ SARASWATI JESHANKAR VS. AGENT BHARATKHAND TEXTILE MANUFACTURING CO LTD [LAWS(GJH)-1965-3-9] [REFERRED TO]
LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED FAKIR CHAND AMBARAM PATEL VS. O L OF AMRUTA MILLS LIMITED [LAWS(GJH)-2002-7-114] [REFERRED TO]
VIMAL KUMAR THAKURIA VS. INDORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(MPH)-2019-6-181] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. HOTEL EXCELSIOR LTD [LAWS(DLH)-2012-9-220] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. ADIL SINGH [LAWS(DLH)-2013-1-15] [REFERRED TO]
DHANISTA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS VS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(BOM)-2023-10-33] [REFERRED TO]
MUTHUKRISHNAN VS. RAMAIAN [LAWS(MAD)-1997-11-91] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED VS. UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH [LAWS(P&H)-1975-3-13] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD AZIM VS. DAUDI BOHRA JAMAT SOLE TRUSTY HIS HOLINESS SAIYADANA DR MOHAMMAD BURHANUDDIN MANAGING COMMITTEE [LAWS(CHH)-2020-3-94] [REFERRED TO]
SWAMI JAI RAM CHELA SARJU DAS VS. HARI SINGH [LAWS(DLH)-1966-5-7] [REFERRED TO]
GULAM NABI ZARKOB VS. GULAM RASOOL [LAWS(J&K)-1985-5-6] [REFERRED TO]
MANORAMABAI ALIAS SHAMRAO VS. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SAONER [LAWS(BOM)-2010-4-130] [REFERRED TO]
B P SINHA VS. SOM NATH [LAWS(ALL)-1970-7-16] [REFERRED TO]
JOHN VICTOR VS. PATTUKOTTAI ARULMIGU VISWANATHASWAMY TEMPLE [LAWS(MAD)-2002-9-159] [REFERRED TO]
CHAPSIBHAI DHANJIBHAI DANAD VS. PURUSHOTTAM [LAWS(SC)-1971-4-24] [REFERRED TO]
JUTHIKA MULICK VS. MAHENDRA YASHWANTLAL [LAWS(SC)-1994-10-65] [RELIED ON]
GOPI MOHAN NATH VS. GOPAL NUNIA & OTHERS [LAWS(GAU)-2009-8-91] [REFERRED TO]
CHINNA PILLAI VS. N GOVINDASWAMI NAIDU [LAWS(MAD)-1967-3-1] [REFERRED TO]
INDU BHUSAN BOSE CHOUDHARY VS. HARI BHAJAN SINGH [LAWS(PAT)-1975-11-10] [REFERRED TO]
SWAMI JAI RAM CHELA SARJU DAS VS. HARI SINGH [LAWS(P&H)-1966-5-6] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

Sinha, C. J. - (1.)This appeal by special leave granted by this Court on April 20, 1961, is directed against the concurrent decisions of the Courts below decreeing the plaintiff's suit for ejectment on the ground that the defendant is a tenant at will and negativing the appellants' claim to a permanent tenancy. The controversy between the parties depends upon the true construction of the lease dated October 26, 1914, executed between the predecessors in interest of the parties to the present litigation.
(2.)The facts leading up to this appear are as follows:-
(3.)One N. J. Gamodia of Bombay took on lease a piece of agricultural land measuring about 41/2 acres belonging to one Gurupadappa of Devangere City for the purpose of erecting a Ginning and Pressing Cotton Factory. The terms of the registered lease deed dated October 26, 1914, in so far as they are material for the determination of this appeal are better stated in the relevant portions of the deed itself:-
"1. For the 1st period of 20 (twenty) years commencing from the 1st October, 1914, and ending on the 30th day of September, 1934, you shall pay to me Rs. 350/ (three hundred and fifty rupees) being the annual rent reserved every year in advance and obtain proper receipts of the payment from me. If before the expiration of the said period of 20 (twenty) years you will remove your factory from the said land hereby leased, you, are bound to pay me annually the rent of Rs. 350 (three hundred and fifty rupees) for the (torn) 20 (twenty) years but you are entitled to retain in possession of and the road till the 30th September, 1934.

2. After the expiration of the said period of 20 (twenty) years mentioned in the 1st clause hereby you shall be at liberty to continue the lease of the said land and the said road and keep the said land and the said road in your possession as long as you may desire to do. In case of your thus continuing the lease of the said land and the said road you shall pay to me annually the sum of Rs. 400 (four hundred rupees) as rent of the said land and the said road for 1st ten years beginning from the 1st October, 1934, and ending on the 30th September, 1944, and after the expiration of the period of ten years the annual rent payable by you for the said land and the said road will be Rs. 500 (five hundred rupees) per annum but, you shall always be at full liberty to give up the said land the said road and terminate this lease at any time you may desire so to do after the 1st October, 1934, and the rent payable in respect of the said land and the said road shall cease to be paid by you from the time you may give up the said land and the said road after the 1st October, 1934. But I agree and bind myself not to call upon you at any time to give up the possession of the said land and the said road as long as you may desire to keep the same for your purposes observing the terms of this agreement.

3. **********

4. **********

5. You are at full liberty to erect, as many buildings, godowns, factories, bungalows and other structures etc. as you may desire on the land hereby leased and to pull down, re-erect and make any alterations in the same as you may desire. I shall not noise any objection to your erecting any such structures on the land or to your use, and enjoyment of the land in any way or for any purpose as you may desire.

6. **********

7. I hold myself liable to pay always the annual assessment of the land hereby leased to Government; you shall not be liable for such land assessment. But you shall be liable to pay all fines and other taxes which the Government will hereafter impose for having converted the arable or cultivable land into land for factories and building purposes.

8. **********

9. **********

10. You shall be always entitled and have full liberty to sublet or re-let the said land together with the said road for any purpose to any other person or persons on any conditions you like but without affecting in the least any of the conditions or terms of this lease.

11. **********

12. **********

13. **********

14. This lease is binding on me, my heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns as well as on your heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. I have hereby by this writing granted you this lease by my own free will and in my full serves and I bind myself to abide by its terms and conditions mentioned above".



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.