LOKMANYA MILLS BARSI LIMITED Vs. BARSI BOROUGH MUNICIPALIT BARSI
LAWS(SC)-1961-3-15
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: BOMBAY)
Decided on March 14,1961

LOKMANYA MILLS BARSI Appellant
VERSUS
BARSI BOROUGH MUNICIPALITY,BARSI Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

MOTIRAM KESHAVDAS V. AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL BOROUGH [REFERRED TO]
BOROUGH MUNICIPALITY OF AMALNER VS. PRATAP SPINNING WEAVING AND MANUFACTURING CO LTD [REFERRED TO]
MADRAS AND SOUTHERN MAHRATTA RY CO LTD VS. BEZWADA MUNICIPALITY [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

R.R. DALAVAI VS. THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT R.D. AND L.A. DEPARTMENT AND ANR. [LAWS(MAD)-1977-10-45] [REFERRED TO]
LOKAMANYA MILLS BARSI LIMITED VS. BARSI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL BARSI [LAWS(BOM)-1966-11-9] [REFERRED TO]
NANDYAL MUNICIPALITY VS. BAGARAPU PAPAIAH [LAWS(APH)-2002-7-42] [REFERRED TO]
DEVIDAS LOTU BHIRUD VS. PACHORA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL [LAWS(BOM)-1998-5-19] [REFERRED TO]
ALCON RESORT HOLDINGS LTD VS. DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER [LAWS(BOM)-2002-8-57] [REFERRED TO]
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL NIZAMABAD VS. CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION NIZAMABAD [LAWS(APH)-2004-12-16] [REFERRED TO]
THE COMMISSIONERS OF ASANSOL MUNICIPALITY VS. BAIDAY NATH GORAI [LAWS(CAL)-1984-3-52] [REFERRED TO]
K. BALASUBRAMANIAM VS. THE COMMISSIONER, GREATER CHENNAI CORPORATION [LAWS(MAD)-2022-12-142] [REFERRED TO]
CHHOTELAL VERMA VS. CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NAGPUR [LAWS(BOM)-1963-9-7] [REFERRED TO]
CENTURY SPINNING AND MANUFACTURING CO LIMITED VS. DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY OF ULHASNAGAR [LAWS(SC)-1967-11-32] [REFERRED TO]
KRBL LIMITED VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2013-1-198] [REFERRED TO]
ST. JOSEPH GRANITES VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2016-10-23] [REFERRED TO]
AHMEDABAD MANUFACTURING AND CALICO PRINTING COMPANY LIMITED VS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY [LAWS(BOM)-1987-7-50] [REFERRED TO]
NEW MANEK CHOWK SPG AND WVG MILLS COMPANY LIMITED VS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF AHMEDABADIN ALL THE PETITIONS [LAWS(SC)-1967-2-25] [RELIED ON]
BARSI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL BARSI DISTRICT SHOLAPUR BARSI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL BARSI DISTRICT SHOLAPUR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. LOKAMANYA MILLS BARSI LTD [LAWS(SC)-1972-9-54] [RELIED UPON]
MIDC INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2014-12-219] [REFERRED TO]
Municipal Council Nizamabad VS. Central Warehousing Corporation Nizamabad [LAWS(APH)-2004-12-38] [REFERRED TO]
BANKIM CHANDRA BANERJEE VS. DISTT PANCHAYAT OFFICER [LAWS(CAL)-1964-7-20] [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL NARAYAN VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-1978-8-25] [REFERRED TO]
SHUBH ENTERPRISES VS. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(SIK)-2015-10-5] [REFERRED TO]
DURGA TALKIES VS. STATE [LAWS(ORI)-1993-1-2] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

Shah, J. - (1.)These five appeals raise a common question about the validity of R. 2C framed by the respondent-the Municipality of Barsi under S. 58(j) of the Bombay Municipal Boroughts Act,1925-hereinafter called the Act. The Lokmanya Mills- hereinafter called the appellants-are a company registered under the Indian Companies Act holding an extensive area of land City Survey No. 2554 within the Municipal Borough on which are constructed buildings of the factory, warehouses, bungalows and other structures appurtenant to the factory. The respondent, a Borough Municipality constituted under the Act is by S. 73, entitled to levy a rate on lands and buildings and also a water-rate. Under the rules framed by the Municipality, house-tax and water-tax were levied on buildings and non-agricultural lands on their annual letting value at uniform rates whether the purpose was residential, business or manufacturing.
(2.)In 1944, the Municipality resolved to enhance the assessment of lands and buildings within its area. After some correspondence with the Commissioner Central Division, the General Body of the Municipality resolved that the rental value for levying rates on mills and factories within its limits be fixed at Rs. 40/- for every100 square feet. Notices of this resolution under S. 75(b) of the Act were issued and objections to the proposed enhancement were invited from the tax-payers, and after obtaining the approval of the Government of Bombay, the new rules were made operative from April 1, 1947. The rules relevant for the purposes of these appeals are:
Rule 2A:- The assessment of house-tax on all lands, buildings and non-agricultural lands, other than Government buildings coming under Proviso A of S. 73 of the Bombay Boroughs Act of 1925, at rates mentioned in the Schedule attached to these rules.

Rule 2B:- In case Government buildings coming under Proviso A of S. 73 of the Bombay Boroughs Act are used beneficially, the assessment of such buildings shall be made as specified in sub-secs. 2 and 3 of S. 74.

Rule 2C:- As regards Mills, factories and buildings relating thereto, the annual letting value shall be fixed at Rs. 40/- per 100 square feet or part thereof for every floor, ground floor or cellar and the tax shall be assessed on the said annual letting value, at the ordinary rate.

Explanation-The words "buildings pertaining thereto" include buildings in the compound of the Mills such as ware-houses, godowns, shops of the mills etc. but does not include residential buildings that is to say bungalows and out-houses.

Note:-Assessment shall be made at the ordinary rate on buildings which are not taxed under R. 2C above.

(3.)The Municipality prepared an assessment list under the new scheme of taxation in respect of factory buildings and buildings relating thereto and issued notices of demand calling upon the appellants to pay house-tax and water-tax newly assessed thereon. The appellants paid under protest the tax demanded, and filed five suits in the court of the Civil Judge, Junior Division of Barsi, to recover the amounts levied by the Municipality in excess of the amounts due under the old scheme. In all these suits, the principal issue raised was about the validity of R. 2C framed by the Municipality for levy of rates "on Mills. Factories and other buildings relating thereto." The trial court held that R. 2C was valid and within the competence of the Municipality and dismissed the suits for refund of house-tax and water-tax. The District Court at Sholapur in appeal declared R. 2C "illegal and ultra vires and by injunction restrained the Municipality from making any claim or demand for house-tax and other taxes from the appellants on the basis of that rule. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay set aside the decree of the District Court disagreeing with the view that R. 2C was ultra vires.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.