ABHAYANAND MISHRA Vs. STATE OF BIHAR
LAWS(SC)-1961-4-53
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PATNA)
Decided on April 24,1961

ABHAYANAND MISHRA Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF BIHAR Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

VARSHA GAUTAM RAJESH GAUTAM VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [LAWS(ALL)-2006-5-31] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. VIPAN KUMAR SON OF PRITAM CHAND [LAWS(HPH)-2015-3-131] [REFERRED]
K RAMESH, S/O KONDAIAH VS. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU, CHENNAI [LAWS(MAD)-2019-7-222] [REFERRED TO]
ARMIN RA @ MEENA VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2015-12-365] [REFERRED TO]
GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-1987-9-29] [REFERRED TO]
PURASTAM TRIPATHY PURUSATTAM PURIA VS. STATE OF ORISSA [LAWS(ORI)-1995-6-7] [REFERRED TO]
SULEKHAN SINGH VS. STATE [LAWS(RAJ)-1999-3-42] [REFERRED]
RAEES-UZ-ZAMA VS. STATE NCT OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2013-5-24] [REFERRED TO]
IQBAL HUSSAIN VS. MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER AND MANDAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE KADIRI ANANTHAPUR [LAWS(APH)-2004-6-31] [REFERRED TO]
LELLA POTLA PADMAJA VS. LELLA KOTESWARA RAO [LAWS(APH)-2006-6-78] [REFERRED TO]
I.K. NARAYANA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2012-11-91] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. MOHAMMAD YAKUB [LAWS(SC)-1980-3-56] [RELIED ON]
V. ABOOBACER VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-1969-7-28] [REFERRED TO]
STATE VS. RAJ KUMAR [LAWS(DLH)-2000-11-98] [REFERRED]
HARI MOHAPATRA VS. STATE OF ORISSA [LAWS(ORI)-1996-4-26] [REFERRED TO]
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT VS. B V MURALIDHAR RAO [LAWS(APH)-2004-7-109] [REFERRED TO]
SANGEETHA N R STAPATHI,EAST NALLUR VS. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE VIGILANCE [LAWS(KER)-2018-4-140] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF H.P. VS. SUBHASH CHAND [LAWS(HPH)-2014-10-22] [REFERRED TO]
DESH RAJ VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2015-2-5] [REFERRED TO]
INDRAJIT SAHA ALIAS BABU SAHA VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2011-6-40] [REFERRED TO]
A.R. SATISH VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2018-4-175] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHNU VS. STATE OF HIM ACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-1997-5-28] [REFERRED TO]
RAMABAI WIFE OF NIVRUTTI CHAVAN VS. NIVRUTTI NIMBHAJI CHAVAN [LAWS(BOM)-1987-8-12] [REFERRED TO]
YUSUF ABDULLA PATEL VS. R.N. SHUKLA [LAWS(BOM)-1969-4-18] [REFERRED TO]
RANJANBEN MAHESHBHAI VASAVA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 OTHER(S) [LAWS(GJH)-2019-3-49] [REFERRED TO]
SUDHIR KUMAR MUKHERJEE AND SHAM LAL SHAW VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(SC)-1973-9-9] [AFFIRMED]
NRISINGHA MURARI CHAKRABORTY VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(SC)-1977-4-30] [FOLLOWED]
SURESH VS. HARYANA STATE [LAWS(P&H)-2007-4-123] [REFERRED TO]
SIVVAM SESHA VS. REPUBLIC OF INDIA [LAWS(ORI)-1988-3-15] [REFERRED TO]
PREMANIDHI SINGH VS. STATE OF ORISSA [LAWS(ORI)-1996-10-16] [REFERRED TO]
PURA LODAR VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PAPUMPARA DISTRICT [LAWS(GAU)-2002-10-13] [REFERRED TO]
KAILASH CHANDRA PAREEK VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2003-3-19] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KERALA VS. SHANTILAL CHOK [LAWS(KER)-1988-5-8] [REFERRED TO]
STATE VS. NAGENDRA PAL SINGH [LAWS(DLH)-1993-11-6] [REFERRED TO]
RANJANBEN MAHESHBHAI VASAVA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 OTHER (S) [LAWS(GJH)-2019-3-96] [REFERRED TO]
VINOD @ VIJAY BHAGUBHAI PATEL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. [LAWS(GJH)-2017-5-60] [REFERRED TO]
A MICHAEL VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MAD)-2009-4-301] [REFERRED TO]
KALAM NARENDRA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(KAR)-2024-5-68] [REFERRED TO]
PANCHAM BATHAM VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2005-7-12] [REFERRED TO]
MADANLAL VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-1986-5-16] [REFERRED TO]
STATE VS. PARASMAL [LAWS(RAJ)-1968-8-10] [REFERRED TO]
OM PARKASH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(SC)-1961-4-28] [DISTINGUISHED]
JAI LAXMI CO-OP HSG SOC VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (THROUGH KALAMBOLI POLICE STATION) [LAWS(BOM)-2018-4-30] [REFERRED TO]
JAI LAXMI CO-OP HSG SOC VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (THROUGH KALAMBOLI POLICE STATION) [LAWS(BOM)-2018-4-30] [REFERRED TO]
HANS RAJ VS. STATE [LAWS(DLH)-1968-11-8] [REFERRED TO]
Stalin Father VS. State of A P [LAWS(APH)-2004-8-85] [REFERRED TO]
KARAMVIRSINH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2011-4-229] [RELIED ON]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. VIPAN KUMAR [LAWS(HPH)-2015-1-28] [REFERRED TO]
YADUNANDAN CHOUDHARY VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2023-6-2] [REFERRED TO]
SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY VS. C PUSHPARAJ [LAWS(MAD)-1998-2-183] [REFERRED TO]
NANJUNDA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2014-3-454] [REFERRED TO]
SITTU VS. STATE [LAWS(RAJ)-1966-3-15] [REFERRED TO]
MOHD SHAMIM VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2009-7-79] [REFERRED TO]
YASH PAL VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-1997-12-90] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF H.P. VS. RAM [LAWS(HPH)-2016-3-39] [REFERRED TO]
HARISCHANDRA NARAYAN KHADAPE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-1982-10-11] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND KHAS MOHAMAD BASALATAILL VS. PRABHATKUMAR SHANTARAM RANGNEKAR [LAWS(BOM)-1984-8-28] [REFERRED TO]
S MUTHIAH PILLAI VS. FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD SHASTRI BHAVAN Ï¿½AÏ¿½WING ROOM NO 4 NO 422 4TH FLOOR NEW DELHI [LAWS(MAD)-1989-3-38] [REFERRED TO]
PREMNARAYAN VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-1988-12-19] [REFERRED TO]
NIRMALA DEVI VS. TARA CHAND AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2013-2-596] [REFERRED]
V. SIMHACHALAM AND 2 ORS. VS. STATE OF ORISSA [LAWS(ORI)-1988-7-25] [REFERRED TO]
RAMCHANDER VS. STATE [LAWS(RAJ)-1965-12-2] [REFERRED TO]
MD. LIAKAT ALI VS. COMMR. OF CUSTOMS (PREV.), KOLKATA, WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CE)-2007-10-126] [REFERRED TO]
DEBDAS ADHIKARY & DINABANDHU ADHIKARY VS. C.C. (PREV.), KOLKATA, W.B. [LAWS(CE)-2007-9-112] [REFERRED TO]
MADHU V.T. VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2014-3-99] [REFERRED TO]
AMIRTHALINGAM VS. STATE [LAWS(MAD)-1995-1-74] [REFERRED TO]
RAJU VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2004-5-47] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)This appeal, by special leave, is against the order of the High Court at Patna dismissing the appellant's appeal against his conviction under S. 420, read with S. 511, of the Indian Penal Code.
(2.)The appellant applied to the Patna University for permission to appear at the 1954 M. A. Examination in English as a private candidate, representing that he was a graduate having obtained his B. A. Degree in 1951 and that he had been teaching in a certain school. In support of his application, he attached certain certificates purporting to be from the Headmaster of the School, and the Inspector of Schools. The University authorities accepted the appellant's statements and gave permission and wrote to him asking for the remission of the fees and two copies of his photograph. The appellant furnished these and on April 9, 1954, proper admission card for him was despatched to the Head-master of the School.
(3.)Information reached the University about the appellant's being not a graduate and being not a teacher. Inquiries were made and it was found that the certificates attached to the application were forged, that the appellant was not a graduate and was not a teacher and that in fact he had been debarred from taking any University examination for a certain number of years on account of his having committed corrupt practice at a University examination. In consequence, the matter was reported to the police which, on investigation, prosecuted the appellant.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.