JUDGEMENT
S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J. -
(1.) Counsel for parties were heard, with their consent, for final disposal of the appeal. The appellant (hereby "insurer ") questions the judgment and order of the
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi; Dated 11/12/2020 in Revision Petition No. 1984/ 2015 ("hereafter the
NCDRC"). In the impugned order, the NCDRC dismissed the appellant 's revision
petition, that challenged the order; dated 20/03/2015, in FA No. 244/2013 of the Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Bikaner (hereafter "the State Commission ").
(2.) The respondent-complainant obtained an insurance policy; bearing policy no. 200104/31/11/0100000947 from the insurer for his Bolero car, somewhere in Punjab, though he was a resident of Sri Ganganagar,
Rajasthan. The vehicle had a temporary registration (No. PB-11-T-5101
from 20-06-2011 to 19-07-2011). The sum insured was ? 6,17,800/-. The temporary registration
of the vehicle, however, expired on 19-07-2011.
(3.) As the respondent/complainant was engaged in business as a private contractor, for business purposes he had to be outside the city. On 28-07-2011 the complainant
went to Jodhpur for business purposes; and stayed in Geeta Guest House at night.
Whilst there, his vehicle was parked outside the guest house premises. When the
respondent awoke in the morning, he found that the Bolero car had been stolen. He
lodged a first information report (FIR) on 29-07-2011 with PS Ratanada, Jodhpur
alleging commission of offences under Section 379, IPC. However, on 30-09-2011
the police lodged a final report stating that the vehicle was untraceable.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.