JUDGEMENT
SURYA KANT, J. -
(1.) The Petitioner DLF Home Developers Limited (hereinafter, "DHDL") has filed Arbitration Petition No. 16 of 2020 and Arbitration
Petition No. 17 of 2020 under Section 11(6) read with Section
11(12) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, "Act") for appointment of sole arbitrator to adjudicate the
differences between the parties that have arisen out of the two
Construction Management Agreements dated 25.01.2017.
FACTS
(2.) DHDL is a limited liability involved in the business of providing development, management, and investment services concerning
real estate projects. The Petitioner and one Ridgewood Holdings
Limited entered into a joint venture, in the year 2007-2008, wherein
Ridgewood Holdings Limited invested in four Special Purpose
Vehicles, including Rajapura Homes Private Limited (Respondent
No.1 in Arbitration Petition No.17 of 2020; hereinafter, "Respondent
No.1") and Begur OMR Homes Private Limited (Respondent No.1 in
Arbitration Petition No.16 of 2020; in short "Begur Company"), for
developing residential projects in various cities across India.
Respondent No.1 is a company engaged in the construction,
development, operations, and maintenance of residential projects,
namely, 'DLF Maiden Heights' and 'DLF Woodland Heights,' both of
which are in Bangalore, Karnataka (collectively called "Rajapura
Project"). Similarly, the Begur Company is engaged in the business
of construction, development, operations, and maintenance of
residential projects, namely, 'DLF Garden City' situated at
Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, and 'DLF Westend Heights'
situated in Bengaluru District, Karnataka (collectively called
"Southern Homes Project").
(3.) In June 2008, Ridgewood Holdings Limited transferred its stake in the joint venture to its affiliates, Resimmo PCC (in short,
"Respondent No.2") in both the Petitions and Clogs Holding BV
(hereinafter, "Clogs"). Thereafter, in terms of the arrangement,
upon expiry of the exit period, Respondent No.2 and Clogs were
inter alia entitled to a put option on the Petitioner, which they
exercised from January to May 2014. However, the Petitioner was
unable to provide an exit to Respondent No.2 and Clogs.
Subsequently, in 2015, the parties agreed to a negotiated
settlement, in terms of which, Respondent No.2 was to acquire sole
ownership and control of two Special Purpose Vehicles, namely,
Respondent No.1 and the Begur Company. It may be noted that
Respondent No.2 is a company incorporated under the laws of
Mauritius and is engaged in the business of providing investment
management services.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.