JUDGEMENT
DR.DHANANJAYA Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. -
(1.)A. The appeal : These appeals arise from judgments dated 1 July 2021 [ SLP (Criminal) No 5786 of 2021 (the "lead appeal")] and 31 May 2021 [SLP (Criminal) No 5788 of 2021 (the "companion appeal")] of
a Single Judge of the Jabalpur Bench of the High Court for the State of Madhya
Pradesh through which it allowed the applications for anticipatory bail filed by the
second respondents in both the appeals under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure 1973 ["CrPC"] in connection with a crime [Crime No 329 of 2020] registered at the Police Station Majholi,
District Jabalpur, State of Madhya Pradesh for the offences punishable under
Sections 302 and 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 ["IPC"].
(2.)The crime was registered on the basis of a dehati nalsi/FIR lodged by the appellant on 29 September 2020. The allegation in the FIR is that the appellant was
at Negai Tiraha with the deceased, Vikas Singh (who was his brother in-law) and
two other individuals (Rajkishore Rajput and Dharmender Patel). It was alleged that
the four accused persons, namely Ujiyar Singh, his two sons Chandrabhan Singh
and Suryabhan Singh (the second respondent in the companion appeal) and his
driver Joginder Singh (the second respondent in the lead appeal) arrived in a jeep.
Thereafter, allegedly due to a previous rivalry, Ujiyar Singh and Chandrabhan Singh
shot at Vikas Singh, while Joginder Singh held him, leading to his death while
Suryabhan Singh hit the appellant on his head with the butt of his gun, leading to an
injury. Upon being brought to a hospital, Vikas Singh was pronounced dead,
following which the appellant got the FIR registered.
(3.)Suryabhan Singh and Joginder Singh filed applications seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, apprehending their arrest in relation to the
crime. While allowing the application for anticipatory bail of Joginder Singh, the High
Court noted that according to the report submitted by the investigating officer under
Section 173 of the CrPC, the investigation did not reveal that he was even present at
the spot of crime. The High Court observed that the veracity of such a report could
not be questioned at this stage. Further, it held that even if he was present at the
spot, there was no allegation against him of having fired at the deceased-Vikas
Singh or having provoked Ujiyar Singh/Chandrabhan Singh to fire at the deceased-
Vikas Singh. Hence, the High Court passed the following order allowing his
application for anticipatory bail:
"So, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed and it is directed that if the applicant surrenders himself before concerned court within fifteen days from today, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one surety in like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his regular appearance before the Court during trial.
This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the
following conditions by the applicant:-
1.The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;
2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;
3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;
5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and
6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be."
Similarly, while considering the application filed by Surbhayan Singh, the High Court
observed that the report of the investigating officer under Section 173 of the CrPC
indicated that he was not present at the spot of the incident, but was in Jabalpur on
the basis of the statements of witnesses, tower location of mobile numbers of the
accused persons and the CCTV footage. The High Court held that the 'only'
allegation against Surbhayan Singh was that he attacked the appellant, but that it
only resulted in a simple injury. Hence, the High Court allowed his application for
anticipatory bail, observing:
"8... So, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed and it is directed that if the applicant surrenders himself before concerned court within fifteen days from today, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one surety in like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his regular appearance before the Court during trial.
9. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-
1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;
2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;
3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;
5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and
6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be."
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.