JUDGEMENT
S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J. -
(1.) Leave granted. The Commissioner of Police, Delhi ( "the appellant ") is in appeal, aggrieved by a common judgment of the Delhi High Court by which the
respondents (hereafter referred to as "candidates/applicants ") were directed to be considered for appointment to the post of Constable of Delhi Police.
(2.) An advertisement was issued in the year 2009, inviting applications from eligible candidates to fill up vacancies in the cadre of constable in the Delhi Police. It
is not in dispute that the respondent candidates, in their applications, disclosed that
criminal cases had been instituted against them - as well as the outcome of those
cases. Except in SLP(C) 18396/2014 where the applicant Deepa Tomar was facing
trial, the criminal cases had ended in compromise. After due consideration of their
candidature, and in terms of S.O. No.398/2010, the appellant referred their cases to a
Standing Committee, to assess their suitability. In Deepa Tomar 's case, the
consideration was deferred since she was facing trial in criminal proceedings where
she was charged with committing the offence of kidnapping under Section 364 IPC.
By various orders, which were impugned in separate proceedings by the candidates,
the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) allowed the applications of the
candidates, upholding their pleas, and quashing the orders of the Screening
Committees. All the orders of the CAT were impugned by the appellant before the
High Court. They were dealt with and considered by the common impugned order,
which rejected the appellant 's petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India.
(3.) The main argument by the candidates was that having regard to the terms of the applicable Standing Order as well as the decisions of this Court, the rejection of
their candidature was unsustainable because of non-application of mind and further
the orders were made in a mechanical manner. By the impugned order, the Division
Bench allowed the writ petitions and quashed the rejection of the candidatures of the
respondents.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.