UNION OF INDIA Vs. KRAFTERS ENGINEERING AND LEASING P LTD
LAWS(SC)-2011-7-61
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: BOMBAY)
Decided on July 12,2011

UNION OF INDIA Appellant
VERSUS
KRAFTERS ENGINEERING AND LEASING (P) LTD. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

P. Sathasivam, J. - (1.) This appeal by Union of India arises out of the final judgment and order dated 24.04.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal No. 219 of 2006 in Arbitration Petition No. 274 of 2005 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed their appeal.
(2.) Brief facts: (a) On 16.05.1988, the Respondent was awarded with a contract for the work of Provision of Signaling Arrangements at "C" Class Stations on Igatpuri Bhusawal Section and 2 "C" Stations on Bhusawal-Badnera Section of Bhusawal Division of Central Railway at the cost of Rs. 18,10,400/-. On completion of the contract, the Respondent raised certain disputes/claims by filing Suit No. 2822 of 1993 before the High Court and demanded for adjudication through arbitration. The High Court directed the General Manager of the Central Railway to appoint an arbitrator and refer the disputes for adjudication. Since the Arbitrator appointed could not deliberate the matter within the time limit, the Respondent invoked the jurisdiction of the Umpire. The Umpire, by order dated 26.04.2005, gave award for Claim Nos. 1, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 & 13 and rejected Claim Nos. 2, 5, 7 & 14 and mentioned that a bank guarantee towards security deposit against claim No. 4 is to be returned. (b) Challenging the award given by the Umpire for Claim Nos. 11 & 13, the Appellant herein filed Arbitration Petition No. 274 of 2005 before the High Court. The learned Single Judge of the High Court, vide order dated 06.12.2005 dismissed their petition. (c) Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned single Judge, the Appellant herein filed an appeal being Arbitration Appeal No. 219 of 2006 before the Division Bench of the High Court. The Division Bench, by impugned order dated 24.04.2006, dismissed the appeal. Challenging the said order, the Union of India preferred this appeal by way of special leave before this Court.
(3.) Heard Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, learned Additional Solicitor General for the Union of India and Mr. Ramesh Babu M.R., learned Counsel for the Respondent.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.