JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) As per the prosecution story the appellants and the
complainant party constituted two different groups in an
organization called the Dalit Mukti Sena. It appears that
both groups had been invited to the marriage of one Anil
Janjale on the 22nd May, 1995 which was performed at the
Shishu Mandir near the Railway Hospital. After the
marriage the deceased Prakash was returning to his home
along with his friends Pradeep, Nana Mahajan (PW.2) and
others at about 11.00 p.m. As they came near the Hindi
Church all the accused followed them. Bhagwan Salve, since
deceased, and A.6 Jagan Sonawane were armed with iron
rods. Bhagwan Salve caught hold of the shirt of the
deceased whereupon the other accused assaulted him and hit
him by giving fist blows whereas A.5 Raju Suryawanshi who
was armed with a knife dealt a blow on the left buttock and
Bhagwan Salve and A.6 Jagan Sonawane hit him with iron rods
on the back and stomach. The deceased who was then
grievously injured was taken to the Railway Hospital where
PW.10 - Dr. Gangurde examined him and admitted him into the
Surgical Ward. His statement was recorded by PW.12-
P.I.Panwar and a case under Sections 147, 148, 324, 504 and
506 r/w 149 of the IPC was registered.
(2.) On the admission of the deceased, Dr. Gangurde
summoned Dr. Dhakate (PW.11) a Surgeon, who found an
injury on the buttocks which was stitched up the very same
evening. On the 24th, however, the patient developed signs
of internal bleeding and it was decided to perform an
operation. On opening the stomach it was found at that
stage that the intestines had been perforated at the
jejunum, the spleen too was ruptured and there was an
omental tear causing bleeding from the veins and about 100
c.c. foul smelling liquid was also found in the peritonial
cavity which was suctioned out. The Spleen was also removed
and the bleeding areas were ligatured. On the 5th June,
1995 faecal matter was seen coming out from the stomach
which led to the bursting of the abdomen and as a
consequence thereof a second operation was performed on the
6th June, 1995 and it was at that stage noticed that the
buttock injury was 8.5 cms. deep and that a finger
inserted from the rectum could meet a finger inserted into
the perforation on the buttocks. Consequent to this
development the patient developed septicemia and pneumonia
and died on the 9th June, 1995 at about 2.00 p.m. A case
under Section 302 was registered against the accused. On
the completion of the investigation they were brought
to trial inter alia under Sections 147, 148 and 302/149 of
the IPC. The Trial Court relying on the eye witnesses
account and the medical evidence convicted the accused for
offences punishable under Sections 302/149 etc. of the IPC
and sentenced them to various terms of imprisonment. An
appeal was, thereafter, taken to the High Court and the
High Court, has, while confirming the conviction, modified
the sentence to one under Section 304 (I) read with Section
149 of the IPC and maintained the sentences and conviction
under the other provisions of the IPC. In doing so the
High Court opined that there was no intention on the part
of the accused to cause death and the injury that they had
caused could be said to be likely to cause death. It is in
this situation the matter is now before us.
(3.) As already indicated above, a very limited relief
can be granted to the accused in this matter. We find from
the reading of the medical evidence that PW.11 Dr. Dhakate
at the very initial stage did not realize the gravity of
the situation as he had seen only one injury on the person
of the deceased which was the external injury on the
buttocks as he did not even look at the possibility that
some internal injuries too could have been caused
considering the manner of the attack.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.