JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) These appeals are directed against the common judgment
and final order dated 26.09.2003 passed by the Division
Bench of the High Court of Patna in Criminal Appeal Nos. 293,
307, 311 and 371 of 2000 whereby the High Court upheld the
judgment and order dated 26/27.06.2000 passed by the
Ist Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Nawadah in Sessions Trial
No. 333/97/40/97 convicting the appellants herein for the
offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal
Code (in short the "IPC") read with Section 27 of the Arms Act,
1959, Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC and
Section 324 read with Section 149 of the IPC and maintained
the sentences imposed upon them.
(2.) Brief facts:
(a) The present group of appeals arises out of FIR No. 11 of
1997 registered at Police Station Govindpur, at the instance of
one Naresh Yadav (PW-9) leading to Session Trial No.
333/97/40/97 at the Court of Ist Addl. District & Sessions
Judge, Nawadah.
(b) There was a cross FIR No. 12 of 1997 registered at the
same Police Station at the instance of one Sunil Yadav
(accused No.9 in FIR No. 11 of 1997) which was lodged at the
instance of the accused in FIR No. 11 of 1997.
(c) According to Naresh Yadav (PW-9)-the informant in FIR
No. 11 of 1997, on 28.04.1997, at 9:00 a.m., all of a sudden,
Brahamdeo Yadav, Darogi Mahto, Maho Yadav, Paro Mahto,
Kuldeep Yadav, Sudhir Yadav, Sunil Yadav s/o Bale Yadav,
Bale Yadav, Shiv Nandan Yadav, Sunil Yadav s/o Musafir
Yadav and Suraj Yadav armed with Saif, Bhala, lathis and gun
came in a mob where Suresh Yadav- informant's elder brother,
since deceased, was getting his diesel machine repaired
through a mechanic Mohan Yadav. It was alleged that
accused Brahamdeo Yadav @ Bhonu Yadav shot a fire at
Suresh Yadav in the abdomen and when he went to help him,
Sunil Yadav gave a saif blow causing injury on his lips. It was
also alleged that on hearing alarm Munshi Yadav, Ganuari
Yadav and Bindeshwar Yadav had come and they were also
subjected to assault by the accused persons. He also told that
the victim Suresh Yadav died on the way while being taken to
the hospital.
(d) On the basis of the farde bayan of Naresh Yadav-the
informant, FIR No. 11/97 was registered with Govindpur
Police Station under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307
and 302 IPC against Brahamdeo Yadav, Sunil Yadav s/o Bale
Yadav, Darogi Mahto, Maho Yadav, Paro Mahto, Kuldeep
Yadav, Sudhir Yadav, Bale Yadav, Shiv Nandan Yadav and
Suraj Yadav. Sunil Yadav s/o Musafir Yadav was instituted.
On 29.04.1997, S.I. Anil Kumar Gupta recorded the statement
of Sunil Yadav s/o Musafir Yadav at Nawadah Sadar Hospital
and on the basis of his statement FIR No. 12/97 was
registered with Govindpur Police Station under Sections 147,
148, 149, 323, 324, 307 and 447 IPC against (i) Upendra
Yadav (ii) Rambalak Yadav (iii) Basudev Yadav (iv) Anil Yadav
(v) Ganuari Yadav (vi) Damodar Yadav (vii) Suresh Yadav (viii)
Umesh Yadav (ix) Muni Yadav (x) Naresh Yadav and (xi)
Manager Yadav. The investigations in both the FIRs were
taken by S.I. Mohd. Shibli, Officer-in-charge of Govindpur
Police Station.
(e) After investigation, charge sheet No. 12/97 was
submitted in FIR No. 11/97 and charge sheet bearing No.
36/97 was submitted in FIR No. 12/97 against the accused
persons and thereafter the case was committed to the Court of
Sessions Judge and registered as Sessions Trial No.
333/97/40/97.
(f) The prosecution examined ten witnesses in support of its
claim, namely, Dr. Bipul Kumar, PW-1, Dr. R.K. Bibhuti, PW-
2, Ganuari Yadav, PW-3, Bindeshwar Prasad @ Manager
Yadav, PW-4, Basudeo Yadav, PW-5, Kesho Yadav, PW-6,
Munshi Yadav, PW-7, Minta Devi, PW-8, Naresh Yadav, PW-9
and Md. Shibli, Officer-in-Charge, Nawadh PS. PW-10.
(g) After completion of the trial, learned Sessions Judge
convicted all the accused for the offences punishable under
Sections 302, 324 read with 149 IPC and sentenced them to
undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and further
imprisonment of two years.
(h) Aggrieved by the order passed by the trial Judge, the
accused preferred different sets of appeals, namely, Criminal
Appeal Nos. 293, 307, 311 and 371 of 2000 before the High
Court of Patna. By the impugned judgment and order, after
accepting the prosecution case, the Division Bench of the High
Court upheld the judgment of the Sessions Judge and
dismissed all the appeals.
(i) Aggrieved by the decision of the High Court, Paro Mahto
(A5), Kuldip Yadav (A6), Sudhir Yadav (A7) filed Criminal
Appeal No. 531 of 2005, Brahamdeo Yadav (A1) filed Criminal
Appeal No. 532 of 2005 and Darogi Mahto (A2), Bale Yadav
(A8) and Suraj Yadav (A11) filed Criminal Appeal No. 534 of
2005 before this Court.
(3.) Heard Mr. Rajan K. Chourasia learned counsel for the
appellants in Criminal Appeal Nos. 531 & 534 of 2005, Mr.
J.P.N Gupta, learned amicus curiae for the appellant in
Criminal Appeal No. 532/2005 and Mr. Manish Kumar,
learned counsel for the respondent-State.
FIR Nos. 11/97 and 12/97 ;