JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The purchaser, who was not party to the suit but
impleaded as 2nd respondent in the first appeal and was arrayed as
such in the second appeal, is the appellant being aggrieved by the
judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana
whereby the Single Judge of that Court allowed the second appeal
preferred by the plaintiff (1st respondent) and set aside the
concurrent judgment and decree of the courts below and remanded
the suit to the trial court for fresh disposal after giving the plaintiff an
opportunity to lead evidence.
(3.) In the month of May, 1991, the 1st respondent --
M/s. Tirgun Auto Plast Private Limited - applied to the Punjab
Financial Corporation (for short, 'Corporation') for a term loan of
Rs. 47.60 lac and special capital assistance (soft loan) of Rs. 4 lac.
The term loan of Rs. 46 lac and soft loan of Rs. 4 lac was disbursed
by the Corporation to the 1st respondent in the month of October,
1991 on execution of the mortgage deed. Vide this mortgage deed,
the 1st respondent mortgaged its various assets in favour of the
Corporation. On the 1st respondent's failure to pay the due amount
along with interest, the Corporation on March 19, 1998 took over the
mortgaged property comprising land, building and machinery in
exercise of its power under Section 29 of the State Financial
Corporations Act, 1951 (for short, '1951 Act').;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.