JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal is directed against the
concurrent judgments of the courts below whereby the
appellant has been sentenced to undergo 10 years R.I. and
to pay a fine of rupees one lakh and in default to undergo
RI for two years for having violated the provisions of
Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the
'Act').
(2.) The facts of the case are as under:
During the course of a joint Naka held on the
4th January, 1999 by a party comprising officials from the
Customs Preventive Staff, the Punjab Police and the CIA
Staff, Majitha, set up at the T-crossing near Saki Bridge,
Ajnala, a Maruti car bearing registration No. PB-02-P-5595
was seen coming from the opposite side at about 9.40 a.m.
There were three occupants in the car and two of them
taking advantage of the thick fog at that time ran away
whereas the third one, the appellant Nirmal Singh, was
apprehended by PW.4 Prem Singh-Superintendent Customs.
PW.4 disclosed his identity to the appellant and told him
that as he was suspected to be in possession of some
narcotic, he should give his option as to whether he wished
to be searched before a Magistrate or a Gazetted Officer.
The appellant stated that he would be satisfied if he was
searched in the presence of a Gazetted officer. Khazan
Singh and Sarup Singh were also called as public witnesses.
On a search of the appellant's person two packets of brown
powder each weighing 1 kilogram were found lying in his
lap. The powder was tested with the aid of a drug testing
kit and was found to be heroin. Samples of 5 grams were
drawn from each packet and after the samples had been
homogenized, they were sent to the laboratory for
analysis. The Chemical Examiner in his report opined that
the seized articles were indeed heroin.
(3.) During the course of the investigation the
appellant also made a confession under Section 108 of the
Customs Act admitting his guilt. The matter was
ultimately sent up for trial after the completion of the
investigation. Sarup Singh and Khazan Singh, the
independent witnesses, were given up as having been won
over by the appellant. The prosecution accordingly placed
primary reliance on the statement of PW.1 Jagtar Singh,
Inspector of Customs and PW.4 Prem Singh and the confession
of the appellant made to him as also the circumstantial
evidence in the case. The accused was also examined under
Section 313 of the Cr. P.C. and he stated that he had been
roped in on account of his animosity with Swaran Singh-DSP
and his brother Kartar Singh-SP as he had been involved in
the murder case of their brother, Ranjit Singh. He also
produced several witnesses in defence.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.