VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LIMITED Vs. UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(SC)-2011-5-66
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: DELHI)
Decided on May 11,2011

VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LIMITED Appellant
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

G.S. Singhvi, J. - (1.) Leave granted.
(2.) Whether the Delhi High Court could entertain the petition filed by the Respondents under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, "the Act") for grant of a declaration that Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) is contractual and juridical seat of arbitration and for issue of a direction to the arbitral tribunal to continue the hearing at Kuala Lumpur in terms of Clause 34 of Production Sharing Contract (PSC) is the question which arises for consideration in this appeal
(3.) Respondent No. 1 - Government of India owns petroleum resources within the area of Indias territorial waters and exclusive economic zones. Respondent No. 2 is an arm of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. On 28.10.1994, a PSC was executed between Respondent No. 1 on the one hand and a consortium of four companies consisting of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited, Videocon Petroleum Limited, Command Petroleum (India) Private Limited and Ravva Oil (Singapore) Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as "the Contractor") in terms of which the latter was granted an exploration licence and mining lease to explore and produce the hydro carbon resources owned by Respondent No. 1. Subsequently, Cairn Energy U.K. was substituted in place of Command Petroleum (India) Private Limited and the name of the Videocon Petroleum Limited was changed to Petrocon India Limited, which merged the Appellant - Videocon Industries Limited. For the sake of convenience, the relevant clauses of Articles 33, 34 and 35 of the PSC are extracted below: 33.1 Indian Law to Govern Subject to the provisions of Article 34.12, this Contract shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of India. 33.2 Laws of India Not to be Contravened Subject to Article 17.1 nothing in this Contract shall entitle the Contractor to exercise the rights, privileges and powers conferred upon it by this Contract in a manner which will contravene the laws of India. 34.3 Unresolved Disputes Subject to the provisions of this Contract, the Parties agree that any matter, unresolved dispute, difference or claim which cannot be agreed or settled amicably within twenty one (21) days may be submitted to a sole expert (where Article 34.2 applies) or otherwise to an arbitral tribunal for final decision as hereinafter provided. 34.12. Venue and Law of Arbitration Agreement The venue of sole expert, conciliation or arbitration proceedings pursuant to this Article, unless the Parties otherwise agree, shall be Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and shall be conducted in the English language. Insofar as practicable, the Parties shall continue to implement the terms of this Contract notwithstanding the initiation of arbitral proceedings and any pending claim or dispute. Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 33.1, the arbitration agreement contained in this Article 34 shall be governed by the laws of England. 35.2 Amendment This Contract shall not be amended, modified, varied or supplemented in any respect except by an instrument in writing signed by all the Parties, which shall state the date upon which the amendment or modification shall become effective. ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.