RAJASTHAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED Vs. JAI RAJ SINGH
LAWS(SC)-2011-5-95
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: RAJASTHAN)
Decided on May 09,2011

Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation Limited Appellant
VERSUS
Jai Raj Singh Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Leave granted.
(2.) While he was posted as Chief Inspector in the Mount Abu office of the Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation (for short, 'the Corporation'), the Respondent submitted an application for grant of leave for 66 days from 27.10.1999 to 31.12.1999 by stating that he was to go to Trinidad, West Indies to meet his wife, who was working there as a doctor. The application of the Respondent was forwarded to the competent authority. However, before the leave could be sanctioned, the Respondent went abroad and that too without seeking permission from the concerned authority. He was placed under suspension vide order dated 2.12.1999 and was served with charge sheet dated 26.2.2000 for holding an enquiry under the Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1989 (for short, "the Rules") on the charges of remaining absent from duty and going to a foreign country without taking permission from the competent authority. The Respondent neither filed reply to the charge sheet nor joined duty. Instead, he sent an application for extension of leave. His request was rejected vide telegram dated 28.2.2000. On the next day, the Respondent reported for duty. After one month, he filed reply dated 22.3.2000 and pleaded that his absence was due to reasons beyond his control inasmuch as he had to leave the country to settle his wife at Trinidad, West Indies. 2. Shri S.M. Kedwal, who was appointed as an Enquiry Officer, submitted report with the finding that both the charges are proved against the Respondent. A copy of the enquiry report was sent to the Respondent along with show cause notice dated 27.8.2000.
(3.) In the meanwhile, the Respondent again applied for leave for one year with effect from 1.8.2000. This time, the officers of the Corporation including its Executive Director exhibited extraordinary sympathy with the Respondent, which resulted in sanction of leave on 28.7.2000 for a period of 90 days subject to the following conditions: 1. He will not stay more than the period of leave sanctioned as above. 2. He will not accept any assignment in any foreign country. 3. He will not apply for extension of leave while abroad. 4. He will not apply for seeking voluntary retirement while abroad. 5. He will not delay the process of D.E. Pending against him.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.