JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This is rather an unfortunate case. There were
five accused in all who were sentenced by the trial
court for offences punishable under Section 376(2)(g),
201 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 3(2)
(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The allegation
was that the five accused, and A1 in particular, who
was the main accused and involved with the deceased in
a clandestine relationship, had raped her on the night
intervening the 28 and 29th of January, 1999. The trial
court in its judgment dated 31st August, 2000 held the
case against the accused to be proved and they were,
accordingly, sentenced to death under section 302 or
Section 302/34 of the IPC and to various terms of
imprisonment under the various other sections under
which they had been charged.
(2.) An appeal was thereafter taken by the accused to
the High Court and a reference was also made for the
confirmation of the death sentence. The High Court has
by its impugned judgment declined the reference and at
the same time allowed the appeal of the accused
acquitting them in toto.
(3.) The present appeals have been filed at the
instance of the complainant who is the father of the
deceased. We see from the record that A1 was the main
accused. As per the death certificate which has been
put on record, he has passed away on the 30th June,
2009. The appeal qua him is, accordingly, abated. We
have, accordingly, examined the evidence with respect
to A2 to A5.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.