JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This petition under Article 136 of the Constitution has
been filed by the State of Punjab praying for special leave to
appeal against the order dated 11.12.2007 of the High
Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
51620 of 2007 (for short "the impugned order").
(2.) The facts very briefly are that on 18.04.2007
respondent no.3 lodged FIR No. 82 at Police Station City-I,
Moga against Simran Kaur @ Indu and her husband Ajay
Kumar alleging offences under Sections 366, 376, 406, 420,
506, 344 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code,
1860 (for short 'the IPC'). Pursuant to the FIR, Simran Kaur
and Ajay Kumar were arrested on 19.04.2007, but Ajay
Kumar managed to escape from the custody of police and
FIR No. 83, Police Station City-I, Moga dated 19.04.2007
under Section 224 of the IPC was registered against him. In
course of investigation of the case, respondent no.3 made a
statement before the police under Section 161 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Cr.P.C.') on
23.04.2007 naming 14 other persons who had sex with her
against her will and some of these persons were arrested by
Sub-Inspector Raman Kumar. The statement of respondent
no.3 was recorded on 25.04.2007 under Section 164 of the
Cr.P.C. by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moga. On
08.05.2007, the investigation of the case was entrusted to
Inspector Amarjit Singh, S.H.O. PS City-I, Moga. Some of
the persons named by respondent no.3 in her statements
were found to be innocent and were released. After
completing the investigation, Inspector Amarjit Singh
submitted a charge sheet on 01.06.2007 in Court under
Section 173 of the Cr.P.C naming Simran Kaur @ Indu, Ajay
Kumar, Vimal Kumar, Subhash Chander, Ramesh Kumar,
Randhir Singh, Iqbal Singh, Bharat Bhushan and Inderjit
Singh as accused persons.
(3.) On 04.06.2007 FIR No. 160 was registered under
Sections 342, 323 and 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC
at PS Baghapuran against several accused persons. One of
the accused persons Ranjit Singh, however, made a
complaint to the Additional Director General of Police (Law
and Order) that he has been falsely implicated by Inspector
Amarjit Singh in connivance with Manjeet Kaur because he
had recorded a conversation by Inspector Amarjit Singh
with him in the mobile that he would be arrested if he did
not pay a certain amount to him and a compact disc
containing the recorded conversation was prepared and
attached with the complaint. Investigation into this case
was entrusted to Inspector Bhupinder Singh, Deputy
Superintendent of Police, Bhaga Pura, District Moga. On
completion of the enquiry it was found that the allegations
against the accused persons were false. Accordingly, on
24.10.2007 FIR No. 198 was registered at PS City -I, Moga
under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption
Act, 1988 read with Sections 384, 211 and 120-B of the IPC
against Inspector Amarjit Singh and Manjeet Kaur and
respondent no.3 and Inspector Amarjit Singh were arrested.
During investigation it also came to light that Sub-Inspector
Raman Singh, the then S.H.O., PS Badhnikalan was helping
Manjeet Kaur and respondent no.3 and that Sub-Inspector
Raman Singh had accepted illegal gratification.
Accordingly, offences under Sections 195, 201, 202, 218,
219, 221, 465, 468 and 471 of the IPC were added in the
case registered as FIR no. 198 of 2007 and Sub-Inspector
Raman Singh was also named as an accused alongwith
Inspector Amarjit Singh. Sub-Inspector Raman Kumar was
also dismissed from service by the Senior Superintendent of
Police.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.