JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The appellant is aggrieved by the order of the learned Single
Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court whereby he allowed
the revision filed by respondent No. 1 and vacated the order
of injunction passed by the trial Court, which had been partly
confirmed by the lower appellate Court insofar as it related
to her forcible eviction from suit property, i.e. Kothi No.
84, Phase-IX, SAS Nagar (Mohali).
(3.) The appellant and respondent No. 1 were married in 1978.
After 15 years of the marriage, respondent No. 1 filed a suit
for permanent injunction for restraining the appellant from
interfering with the suit property. On being noticed, the
appellant filed counter claim and pleaded that in terms of
Section 18 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956,
she is entitled to reside in the suit property. The trial
Court dismissed the suit of respondent No. 1 and decreed thecounter claim filed by the appellant. The first and the
second appeals filed by respondent No. 1 were dismissed by the
lower appellate Court and the High Court. Special Leave
Petition (Civil) No. 4193/2000 filed by him was summarily
dismissed by this Court vide order dated 16.3.2000.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.