JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) In the year 2004, the State of Madhya Pradesh has filed
Original Suit No. 6 of 2004 before this Court under Article 131
of the Constitution of India calling for the records relating to
the impugned Notifications/Orders dated 02.11.2004 and
04.11.2004 issued by the Ist Defendant-Union of India under
Sections 58(3) and 58(4) of the Madhya Pradesh Re-
organisation Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as "MPR Act"),
notifying the date of dissolution of the M.P. Electricity Board
(in short "the MPEB") for the undivided State of Madhya
Pradesh and apportioning its assets, rights and liabilities
between the successor Electricity Boards for the reorganized
States of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh and to declare
them null and void as the same are unconstitutional and for
certain other reliefs.
(2.) In the said suit, the plaintiff-State of Madhya Pradesh
filed an application for amendment of plaint being I.A. No.4 of
2009 seeking, inter alia, the amendment to the effect that
Sections 58(3) and 58(4) of the MPR Act are violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India inasmuch as it enables the
Central Government to determine without any guidelines the
manner of exercise of power while deciding the basis of
apportionment of the assets and liabilities of the successor
Boards.
(3.) Ist Defendant-Union of India, apart from disputing its
maintainability on delay and laches also contested on merits.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.