JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) KAVITA , a tiny little baby of just one year and odd was made a sacrificial lamb for propitiating the gods in order to get a child for another
lady who was childless. The irony is that the perpetrators had chosen Gandhi
Jayanti Day for committing this heinous crime. Kavita was burnt and thrown
into a water tank on the same night. Six persons were arraigned by the police
for hatching a criminal conspiracy for the said murder. All the six were
convicted by the trial court and all were sentenced to death. But the High
Court confirmed the conviction and sentence passed on two among them
(A-1 Shakila and A-2 Babu Lal). In regard to the other accused, the High
Court extended the benefit of doubt and acquitted them of the principal
offence under S. 302 read with S. 120-B, though all of them were
convicted of the offence under S. 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. As we
are concerned with the conviction and sentence of A-2 Babu Lal, it is not
necessary for us to mention anything regarding the other accused in greater
detail. That apart, A-1 Shakila has not chosen to challenge the conviction and
sentence passed on her which were confirmed by the High Court.
(2.) THE third accused Chaman is the daughter of A-1 Shakila. As she was unable to give birth to a child despite lapse of many years after marriage, her
mother Shakila and the daughter might have been thinking of devices to have
a child for Chaman. According to the prosecution case, the idea of sacrificing
another child for pleasing the gods to enable Chaman to bear a child was
injected into the minds of Shakila and Chaman by the sixth accused Tabiz
Khan. Thereafter, all the six accused conspired together and evolved a
scheme for it. They fixed up a child for the purpose of making that baby the
sacrificial lamb for the purpose.
It was on the night of 2/10/1987 when the entire locality was bustling with festival activities connected with Ram Leela celebrations the little child
Kavita was sleeping on a cot in the company of her grandfather (PW 7, Tale
Ram). The rest of the members of the family had gone to witness the display
of the celebrations. The said time was utilised for abducting the child.
(3.) THE present appellant Babu Lal was assigned with the task of abducting the child. He went to the place where the child was sleeping on a
cot just outside the house. At a particular time the grandfather had gone out
for answering the call of nature. The appellant Babu Lal had knocked away
the child during that short interval. On the way, appellant Babu Lal was
buttonholed by PW 3, Ram Phal but the appellant told him to mind his own
business, lest, he would have to meet dire consequences. This was enough to
scare PW 3 who went home and slept. The child was taken to the other
members of the conspiracy. After performing some ceremonial rituals on the
child she was put to burn and thereafter she was dropped in the water tank
where she died of drowning.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.