JUDGEMENT
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J. -
(1.) This appeal by special leave is filed by the tenant against the order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 3205 of 1981dated January 9/10, 1992. (reported in AIR 1992 Bombay 358).
(2.) The question that arises in this appeal is: whether in calculating the ceiling area of the landlord for purposes of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 43-1B of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, should any land held by him outside the State of Maharashtra be computed
(3.) By Maharashtra Act XXXIX of 1964 Chapter III-AA was inserted in the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (for short, 'the Act') and the words " or serving member of the armed forces" were deleted from Section 32-F of the Act, Chapter III-AA contains special provision for termination of tenancy by landlords who are or have been serving members of the Armed forces and for purchase of their lands by tenants. Section 43-1B which is one of the main provisions in that chapter confers a right on the landlord to terminate the tenancy of any land and obtain possession from the tenant thereof. We shall set out here sub-section (1) of Section 43-1B :
"43-1B.(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this Act, but subject to the provisions of this section, it shall be lawful to a landlord at any time after the commencement of the Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Laws (Amendment) Act, 1964, to terminate the tenancy of any land and obtain possession thereof, but - (a) of so much of such land as will be sufficient to make up the total land in his actual possession equal to the ceiling area; and
(b) where the landlord is a member of a joint family, only to the extent of his share in the land (not exceeding the ceiling area) held by the joint family, provided that, the Mamlatdar on inquiry is satisfied that such share has (regard being had to the area, assessment, classification and value of land), been separated by metes and bounds in the same proportion as his share in the entire joint family property and not in a larger proportion.
(2) to (4) ********** " ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.