VIJAY PAL SINGH Vs. STATE N C T OF DELHI
LAWS(SC)-2001-2-118
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: DELHI)
Decided on February 01,2001

ASHOK KUMAR,VIJAY PAL SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) These appeals have been filed by two persons, namely, Ashok Kumar and Vijay Pal Singh, who were convicted of two different offences in one trial held by a Designated Judge under the provisions of Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). As appeals lie directly to this Court under Section 19 of the TADA we heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned counsel for the State in extenso. There were five accused arraigned before the Designated Court to face a charge for the offences under Section 302 read with Sections 34 and 212 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 5 of TADA and some other Sections of the Arms Act. The Designated Judge convicted first accused Ashok Kumar who is appellant in one of the appeals for the offence under Section 302 IPC as well as Section 5 of TADA. On the first count he was awarded imprisonment for life while on the second count rigorous imprisonment for five years was awarded as sentence. The fourth accused who is appellant in the other appeal was convicted of Section 5 of TADA alone. He too was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years.
(2.) The case relates to the murder of one Shyam Sunder @ Billa. It happened at around 9.00 p.m. on 9-9-1990 on the busy street at Jhangir Puri in Delhi. deceased was shot dead by an armed assailant. Thus far we did not find any dispute between the prosecution and the defence.
(3.) The prosecution case runs thus: Appellant-Ashok Kumar and deceased-Shyam Sunder were friends initially, but at the instance of deceased's mother (PW 7Sulochna) their friendship became separated. Ashok Kumar again tried to enlist the friendship of deceased but that was again dissuaded by PW7 and it resulted in burgeoning of enmity in the mind of Ashok Kumar towards the deceased. Added to this another incident happened. A lady was put in possession of a plot at the instance of Ashok Kumar but she was evacuated thereform at the instance of deceased-Shyam Sunder. One or two days prior to the murder, appellant - Ashok Kumar visited the house of the deceased and there was a brawl between the deceased and himself. It was at the behest of the mother of deceased that they were separated and Ashok Kumar left the place in huff after giving a threat that deceased would be dealt with properly which would leave its impact for seven generations.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.