BARAUNI REFINERY PRAGATISHEEL SHRAMIKPARISHAD GENERAL SECRETARY BARAUNI TELSHODHAK MAZDOOR UNION Vs. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD:JOINT CHIEF LABOUR COMMISSIONER CENTRAL
LAWS(SC)-1990-7-28
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: DELHI)
Decided on July 12,1990

BARAUNI REFINERY PRAGATISHEEL SHRAMIKPARISHAD,GENERAL SECRETARY BARAUNI TELSHODHAK MAZDOOR UNION Appellant
VERSUS
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED,JOINT CHIEF LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL) Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

M/S. INDIA YAMAHA MOTOR PVT. LTD. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2013-4-714] [REFERRED TO]
R. NANDHA KUMAR AND OTHERS VS. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK AND OTHERS [LAWS(MAD)-2018-3-1232] [REFERRED TO]
YUKEN INDIA LTD VS. BANGALORE EAST INDUSTRIAL WORKERS UNION [LAWS(KAR)-2005-1-45] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD VS. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS WORKERS UNION [LAWS(CAL)-2000-5-11] [REFERRED TO]
HARI FERTILIZERS VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [LAWS(ALL)-1992-3-59] [REFERRED TO]
I.B.P. COMPANY LTD. VS. GENERAL SECRETARY, CHEMICAL EMPLOYEES UNION, MAZDOOR SABHA BHAVAN, NANDINI ROAD, BHILAI [LAWS(CHH)-2016-11-31] [REFERRED TO]
BINDA PRASAD SINGH VS. PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT DIBRUGARH [LAWS(GAU)-2004-1-45] [REFERRED TO]
SHANKAR NARAYAN GHOSH VS. OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. [LAWS(GAU)-2017-11-35] [REFERRED TO]
I P C L EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION VS. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD [LAWS(GJH)-2011-5-156] [REFERRED TO]
KINARIVALA RJK INDUSTRIES VS. WORKMEN EMPLOYED [LAWS(GJH)-2009-9-148] [REFERRED TO]
THE MANAGEMENT OF THE DIRECTOR, CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF FRESHWATER AQUACULTURE (CIFA) VS. THE UNION OF INDIA (UOI) AND ANR. [LAWS(ORI)-2009-10-95] [REFERRED TO]
MANAGEMENT NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CO LTD VS. MASHOOR SINGH BALI [LAWS(J&K)-2000-7-24] [REFERRED TO]
THE WORKMEN VS. PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL [LAWS(MAD)-2017-2-256] [REFERRED TO]
MANAGEMENT OF SCHNEIDER ELECTRICIT BUSINESS INDIA PVT LTD VS. ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY; GENERAL SECRETARY [LAWS(KAR)-2016-2-428] [REFERRED]
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK VS. C.R.CHANDRASEKARAN [LAWS(MAD)-2013-6-70] [REFERRED TO]
CUBE CONSTRUCTION VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2021-10-1469] [REFERRED TO]
S K MAHAJAN VS. ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE [LAWS(DLH)-1995-9-80] [REFERRED]
INDIA YAMAHA MOTOR PVT LTD VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2013-4-91] [REFERRED TO]
TAJ SERVICES LTD VS. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL I DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2011-8-108] [REFERRED TO]
HULAS RAM VS. CENTRAL COAL FIELDS LTD [LAWS(JHAR)-2004-4-65] [REFERRED TO]
MANAGEMENT OF MADRAS ALUMINIUM CO LTD VS. R PAULMANICKAM [LAWS(MAD)-2007-3-286] [REFERRED TO]
K.L. FRANCIS VS. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-2-49] [REFERRED TO]
MUNICIPAL BOARD RAISINGH NAGAR VS. HARISH CHANDRA JOSHI [LAWS(RAJ)-2002-2-18] [REFERRED TO]
R BALAJI SINGH VS. HINDUSTAN MACHINE TOOLS LIMITED WATCH [LAWS(KAR)-1999-6-36] [REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR METAL BOX INDIA LTD VS. METAL BOX COMPANY WORKERS UNION CHENNAI [LAWS(MAD)-2006-4-53] [REFERRED TO]
VENKADASAN K VS. CHAIRMAN CUM DIRECTOR N L C [LAWS(MAD)-2004-12-5] [REFERRED TO]
BINDA PRASAD SINGH VS. PRESIDING OFFICER [LAWS(GAU)-2003-1-58] [REFERRED TO]
IPCL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION VS. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD AND 4 ORS [LAWS(GJH)-2011-5-196] [REFERRED TO]
KENNAMETAL INDIA LTD VS. KENNAMETAL INDIA EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION [LAWS(KAR)-2010-11-39] [REFERRED TO]
AIRPORT AUTHORITY KARAMCHARI UNION AND ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2016-3-196] [REFERRED TO]
MANAGEMENT OF HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD VS. GENERAL SECRETARY, INDAL EMPLOYEES UNION [LAWS(KAR)-2022-4-63] [REFERRED TO]
K C PRIVATE LIMITED VS. PRESIDING OFFICER [LAWS(SC)-1996-9-97] [FOLLOWED]
TRANSMISSION CORPN A P LTD VS. P RAMCHANDRA RAO [LAWS(SC)-2006-4-88] [REFERRED TO]
GROUP GENERAL MANAGER O N G C LIMITED VS. NARESHKUMAR MANILAL PARMAR [LAWS(GJH)-2001-4-16] [REFERRED]
GENERAL MANAGER U P S B CORPORATION LIMITED VS. CHRISTOPHER FONSECA [LAWS(BOM)-1998-1-12] [REFERRED TO]
AVINASH SALOMAN VS. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED AND ORS. [LAWS(CHH)-2015-11-7] [REFERRED TO]
K JABBAR VS. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT [LAWS(KER)-2011-3-567] [REFERRED]
M S E B OFFICERS ASSOCIATION VS. MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD [LAWS(BOM)-2005-7-97] [REFERRED TO]
Williamson Magor and Co LTD VS. Naru Gopal Laik [LAWS(CAL)-1998-2-36] [REFERRED TO]
THE MANAGEMENT OF SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC IT BUSINESS INDIA PVT. LTD. VS. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPT. OF LABOUR AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2015-1-417] [REFERRED TO]
COROMANDAL FERTILIZERS LTD VS. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL [LAWS(APH)-2000-9-13] [REFERRED TO]
GENERAL SECRETARY M P BIJLI KARMCHARI MAHASANGH VS. SECRETARY M P ELECTRICITY BOARD [LAWS(MPH)-2004-5-18] [REFERRED TO]
HEAVY ENGINEERING CORPORATION LIMITED VS. THEIR WORKMEN AND ORS [LAWS(JHAR)-2016-8-91] [REFERRED]
ALL INDIA TEXTILE JANTA UNION VS. DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER [LAWS(P&H)-1993-12-4] [REFERRED TO]
P VIRUDHACHALAM VS. MANAGEMENT OF LOTUS MILLS [LAWS(SC)-1997-12-116] [RELIED ON]
SHIB RAM MAHTO VS. JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD [LAWS(JHAR)-2003-8-25] [REFERRED TO]
A.M.D. LEENUS VS. MANAGEMENT OF TUTICORIN STEVEDORS ASSOCIATION [LAWS(MAD)-2014-6-251] [REFERRED TO]
PREMIER TYRES LTD VS. GENERAL SECRETARY PREMIER TYRES WORKERS ASSN [LAWS(KER)-1993-3-26] [REFERRED TO]
M D CO-OPERATIVE SUGARS LTD VS. SECRETARY PALGHAT DISTRICT PROGRESSIVE SUGAR [LAWS(KER)-1996-8-42] [REFERRED TO]
RAM PHAL VERMA VS. SCOOTERS INDIA LTD [LAWS(DLH)-2007-5-157] [REFERRED TO]
ADITYA AUTO PRODUCTS & ENGINEERING INDIA PVT. LTD VS. ADITYA AUTO PRODUCTS (NTTF) EMPLOYEES UNION [LAWS(KAR)-2019-7-66] [REFERRED TO]
VINOD KUMAR VS. PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT NO 1 KARKARDOOMA COURTS DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2004-2-1] [REFERRED TO]
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON LIMITED VS. GAUTAM HARI VEDI [LAWS(BOM)-2000-9-58] [REFERRED TO]
TALESHKUMAR MAGANBHAI PATEL AND ORS. VS. AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. [LAWS(GJH)-2015-6-123] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2012-10-32] [REFERRED TO]
KIRLOSKAR ELECTRIC COMPANY AND ORS VS. ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND ORS [LAWS(KAR)-2012-7-660] [REFERRED]
UNITED LABOUR FEDERATION VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MAD)-2001-11-73] [REFERRED TO]
PETROLEUM EMPLOYEES UNION VS. BHARATH PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED [LAWS(MAD)-2002-9-105] [REFERRED TO]
ESCORTS MAHLE NOW FEDERAL MOGUL GOETZE INDIA LTD VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2009-8-302] [REFERRED]
DISTRICT ENGINEERING WORKERS UNION AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2012-10-600] [REFERRED]
MUMBAI SHRAMIK SANGH VS. N D RATHOD CONCILIATION OFFICER [LAWS(BOM)-1991-1-49] [REFERRED TO]
COATS VIYELLA INDIA LTD VS. JUMMA THREAD MILLS LABOUR UNION [LAWS(KER)-1996-10-73] [REFERRED TO]
PARTHA SARATHI REJ VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-1996-10-12] [REFERRED TO]
GOODLASS NEROLAC PAINTS LTD VS. PAINTS EMPLOYEES UNION [LAWS(BOM)-2009-1-124] [REFERRED TO]
D.P.SARAF VS. COAL INDIA LIMITED [LAWS(CHH)-2021-7-64] [REFERRED TO]
AYODHYA PRASAD VS. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, BILASPUR (CG) AND ANOTHER [LAWS(CHH)-2015-11-44] [REFERRED]
THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC IT BUSINESS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, BANGALORE VS. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE AND ANOTHER [LAWS(KAR)-2015-4-485] [REFERRED TO]
KUMBAIAH VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2012-11-78] [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(SC)-1999-12-68] [REFERRED]
UNITED LABOUR FEDERATION VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MAD)-2001-11-121] [REFERRED TO]
GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL COOP BANK THRO LIQUIDATOR VS. GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL COOP BANK STAFF UNION [LAWS(GJH)-2014-3-206] [REFERRED TO]
SOLANKI TUSHAR M VS. KANDLA PORT TRUST [LAWS(GJH)-2012-4-264] [REFERRED TO]
UTI ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED VS. ALL INDIA UNIT TRUST EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION [LAWS(BOM)-2017-5-8] [REFERRED TO]
G PALANI VS. BANK OF BARODA [LAWS(MAD)-2007-8-396] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDRAN PILLAI VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2014-4-100] [REFERRED TO]
GENERAL MANAGER U P S B CORPORATION LIMITED VS. CHRISTOPHER FONSECA [LAWS(BOM)-1998-5-16] [REFERRED TO]
BOMBAY GAS COMPANY LTD VS. G S BAJ [LAWS(BOM)-2008-2-199] [REFERRED TO]
DAURALA SUGAR WORKS VS. STATE OF U P AND 2 ORS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-10-71] [REFERRED TO]
DAURALA SUGAR WORKS VS. STATE OF U P AND 2 ORS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-10-71] [REFERRED TO]
ASHA PANDEY AND ORS. VS. COAL INDIA LTD. AND ORS. [LAWS(CHH)-2016-3-7] [REFERRED TO]
A P PAPER MILLS LIMITED SECUNDERABAD VS. 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF RAJAHMUNDRY [LAWS(APH)-1998-11-9] [REFERRED TO]
ITC LIMITED WORKERS ASSOCIATION VS. MANAGEMENT OF ITC LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2002-1-103] [REFERRED]
ACHYUTA CHARAN PANDA VS. M D PARADEEP PHOSPHATES LTD [LAWS(ORI)-2010-4-10] [REFERRED TO]
KAIRA CAN COMPANY LTD VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2009-10-164] [REFERRED TO]
MARIKUKKALA RAMULTI VS. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, SINGARENI COLLIERIES COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS. [LAWS(TLNG)-2020-5-10] [REFERRED TO]
OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED VS. PRESIDENT, OIL FIELD EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION [LAWS(SC)-2022-2-28] [REFERRED TO]
TTK HEALTHCARE LIMITED VS. PRESIDENT [LAWS(KAR)-2022-7-1457] [REFERRED TO]
T. BABU VS. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION [LAWS(KER)-2014-3-43] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)These two appeals by two different Trade Unions of Barauni Refinery are directed against the decision of the High Court of Delhi which set aside, the modification of Cl. 20 of the Standing Orders certified under S. 5 of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (hereinafter called 'the Standing Orders Act'). The brief facts giving rise to these two appeals are as under:
Two companies, namely, the Indian Re- finery, Limited and Indian Oil Company, Limited amalgamated in 1964 and a new Company known as Indian Oil Corporation, Limited (IOCL) was incorporated. This newly formed company comprised essentially of two divisions, namely, (1) Marketing Division, representing the staff, assets and business of Indian Oil Company Limited, and (2) Refinery and Pipe Lines Division, re-presenting the staff, assets and oil refinery manufacturing of petroleum products of Indian Refinery Limited. The age of superannuation of the staff in the Marketing Division was 60 years whereas the age of superannuation for the Refinery and Pipe Lines Division was fixed at 58 years under Cl. 20 of. the Standing Orders concerning Barauni Refinery. The IOCL has refineries in different parts of the country including one at Barauni. The Standing Orders concerning the Barauni Refinery came into force on 5th December, 1964 as provided by S. 7 of the Standing Orders Act and apply to all work-men employed in the said industrial establishment. Cl. 20 of the Standing Orders reads as under:

"Every employee shall retire from service.

on completing the age of 58 years. Extension for a maximum period of 5 years but not for more than one year at a time may be given at the discretion of the company provided the employee is certified to be fit by the Company's Medical Officer and provided further that the employee concerned also consents to such extension."

(2.)By a joint letter dated 15th December, 1981, 14 recognised unions representing the employees of the IOCL working in different refineries and pipe lines divisions submitted a charter of demands in terms of Cl. 2.1.3 of the long term settlement dated 3rd December, 1979. By Cl. 18 of this charter of demands the superannuation age was sought to be enhanced to 60 years. A similar- charter of demands was forwarded by the Barauni Telshodhak Mazdoor Union to the General Manager, IOCL, Barauni Refinery, on 23rd December, 1981. Pursuant to the presentation of this charter of demands, meetings were held between the Management of IOCL (R and P Division) and the recognised unions of the said Division from time to time. As a result of discussions held at the said meetings a settlement was mutually arrived at by and between the parties on May 24, 1983. Clauses 19 and 21 of this general settlement concerning all the Refineries and Pipe Lines Divisions, inter alia provided as under:
"19. The Corporation agrees that such terms and conditions of service as well as amenities and allowances as are not changed under this settlement shall remain unchanged and operative during the period of the settlement."

"21. The Unions agree that during the period of operation of this settlement, they shall not raise any demand having financial burden on the Corporation other than bonus provided that this clause shall not affect the rights and obligations of the parties in regard to matters covered under S. 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947."

This general settlement was to remain in force from 1st May, 1982 to 30th April, 1986. After this general settlement was signed by the Management and the union representatives a separate memorandum of settlement dated 4th August, 1983 was signed between the IOCL (R and P Division), Barauni Refinery, and their workmen represented by Barauni Telshodhak Mazdoor Union, Barauni Refinery, under Ss. 12(3) and 18(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in conciliation proceedings initiated by the Assistant Labour Commissioner and Conciliation Officer, Begusarai. This settlement too was to remain in force from 1st May, 1982 to 30th April, 1986. Cls. 19 and 21 of this settlement were verbatim reproduction of those in the general settlement dated 24th May, 1983 extracted hereinabove. It may here be mentioned that despite the specific demand made in the charter of demands for the upward revision of' the age of superannuation, no specific provision was made in that behalf either in the general settlement or in the special settlement concerning Barauni Refinery. On the contrary Cl. 19 of both the settlements provides that the terms and conditions of service which are not changed under the settlement shall remain unchanged and operative during the period of settlement.

(3.)The Petroleum and Chemical Mazdoor Union through its General Secretary, Ram Vinod Singh, served notice on the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) under S. 10(2) of the Standing Orders Act for modification of Cl. 20 of the certified standing orders of Barauni Refinery for raising the age of superannuation from 58 years to 60 years mainly on the ground that the staff members working in the Marketing Division superannuated on completing the age of 60 years. It was also contended by the said union that the demand for the upward revision of the age of superannuation could not be pressed at the time of the settlement arrived at pursuant to the charter of demands because the age of retirement was fixed at 58 years under the relevant certified standing orders. It was, therefore, felt necessary that Cl. 20 of the certified Standing Orders applicable to Barauni Refinery of the IOCL should be got suitably modified to raise the age of retirement to 60 years. This demand was based on the averment that the nature of work performed by the workmen in the Refinery and Pipe Lines Division was identical to that performed by the staff members of the Marketing Division. The pay-scales of the employees of the Refinery Division and Marketing Division were also identical. It was, therefore, contended that there was no valid reason for fixing different ages. for retirement for the staff members working in the said two Divisions of IOCL.
;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.