LEENA ROY Vs. SUBRATO ROY
LAWS(SC)-1990-10-2
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on October 26,1990

LEENA ROY Appellant
VERSUS
SUBRATO ROY Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

AMITABHA GHOSH VS. State [LAWS(CAL)-1994-3-20] [REFERRED TO]
RITA BHATTACHARJEE VS. JYOTIRMOY MUKHERJEE [LAWS(CAL)-2009-1-13] [REFERRED TO]
KUMMO DEVI VS. JAI PAL [LAWS(HPH)-2010-1-30] [REFERRED TO]
ASHISH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA VS. ANKITA SRIVASTAVA [LAWS(ALL)-2016-4-28] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)We have considered the entire matter. The parties are present before us and have filed an application for compromise and also for an order for decree of divorce by mitual consent. Since we are not in seisin of the matter it is better to direct the parties to file the application before the City Civil and Sessions Court, Calcutta. If such an application is filed, the Court will dispose of the application as expeditiously as possible Preferably within two weeks from the date of filing of such application, in view of the fact that one of the parties intends to go back to America in connection with her service. Regarding the custody of the child in view of the compromise being effected between the parties we direet the writ, applications and the special leave petition to be disposed of in terms of the compromise. There will be no order as to costs.
Order accordingly.

;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.