RAMA KANT CHATURVEDI JAGDISH GHANDRA S B UPADHYA Vs. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT NORTHERN RAILWAY MORADABAD:DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT NORTHERN RAILWAY MORADABAD:DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT NORTHERN RAILWAY MORADABAD
LAWS(SC)-1980-11-31
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: ALLAHABAD)
Decided on November 18,1980

RAMA KANT CHATURVEDI,JAGDISH GHANDRA,S.B.UPADHYA Appellant
VERSUS
DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, NORTHERN RAILWAY, MORADABAD Respondents

JUDGEMENT

O. Chinnappa Reddy, J. - (1.) These three appeals raise common questions. Pursuant to a decision to progressively dieselise rail transport, the Railway Board, with the approval of the President, decided upon the method of recruitment, training, scales of pay and allowances of the staff employed upon diesel locomotives. In the case of running staff, the post to which initial recruitment was to be made was that of diesel cleaner. Diesel cleaners were to have minimum middle school educational standard, but a proportion of the posts were proposed to be reserved for matriculates with a view to train them as skilled fitters and drivers. Cleaners who were matriculates and medically fit were first to be promoted as Drivers' assistants after passing the prescribed suitability test. Thereafter the promotions were to the posts of shunter, Diesel Driver (C), Diesel Driver (B) and Diesel Driver (A) in that order. These promotions were to be made by selection. As dieselisation was to be introduced soon and as it was not possible to appoint cleaners straightway as drivers, it was proposed to draw upon the staff of the "steam running side" to operate diesel locomotives by providing suitable training to them. It may be useful to extract here the note appended to the Railway Board's letter dated February 3, 1958 in regard to the drawing up of the staff on the steam running side to operate diesel trains. The note is as follows:"Note:- Immediately there will be diesel operation only on goods trains and since the services are to be operated shortly and initial recruitment cannot be made to the cleaners category in the first instance the intention is that staff on the steam running side should be drafted on to diesel operation by providing suitable training in operation of diesel locos. Steam staff so absorbed as drivers grade 'C' will be given three advance increments after normal fixation in the grade 'C' of drivers or over their pay in 'C' grade pay on this basis of three advance increments will be drawn by the staff only for so long as they work as Diesel Drivers and on their reversion to the steam side their pay too would be fixed as though they had not been allowed the benefit of these advance increments. So far as Driver's Assistants and Shunters are concerned, staff should also be drawn from the steam side in the first instance. It is, however, necessary to absorb on the diesel side only matriculates or if non-matriculates, those whose literacy standard is comparable with that of matriculates". On April 18, 1966 the Railway Administration issued another Circular in which it was mentioned that the staff eligible for the posts of Drivers' Assistants were those employed in lower grades of Firemen on the steam side and trained for working in the posts of Drivers' Assistants on the diesel side, subject to the condition that no non-matriculate shall be considered for such posts without the approval of the Headquarters. It was also provided that directly recruited cleaners on the diesel side who were matriculates were also eligible, along with Firemen on the steam side who had received the prescribed training, for appointment as Drivers' Assistants on the diesel side on the basis of a combined seniority list. The inter se seniority of each was to be maintained separately. This letter gave a clear indication that the seniority of Drivers' Assistants was to be reckoned on the basis of their appointment as Drivers' Assistants. whatever their original seniority might have been as Firemen. Earlier, on August 25, 1965, the General Manager, Northern Railway, had clarified the position as follows: "As a result of combination of seniority there may be cases where some persons subsequently junior to others may be officiating in higher grades; such Junior persons will not be reverted to make room for persons, senior to them. The senior persons will be considered for promotions in higher grade against future vacancies, subject to their fulfilling any other conditions that might have been or might be laid down. The seniority of D. S. L. side is a separate unit vide Rly. Board's letter No. E (SI) 57 Rs. 6 D/- 3-2-1958".
(2.) Thereafter on August 5, 1966 applications were invited from Firemen Grades B and C who were matriculates and who were desirous of taking Diesel Drivers' Assistants training. The present appellants who were matriculates and who were employed as Firemen Grade 'C' on the steam side submitted their applications and on passing the prescribed test and completion of necessary training, were appointed as Drivers' Assistants on the diesel side on various dates between 1968 and 1970 on an officiating basis. Subsequently on January 21, 1969 the prescription of minimum educational qualification as Matriculation was relaxed and it was said that steam staff who were otherwise considered suitable were not to be debarred from being appointed on the diesel side soley on the ground of educational qualification. After the relaxation of minimum educational qualification, there was a large influx of staff from the steam side to the diesel side. Many Firemen who were senior to the appellants on the steam side were inducted into the diesel side.
(3.) The question of confirmation of the staff inducted into the diesel side from the steam side came up for consideration and it was decided that those employed 'to officiate in a regular manner, by virtue of their seniority-cum-suitability or position in the panel against permanent vacancies should be considered for confirmation after one year's service provided they fulfilled other conditions for confirmation, vide Board's letter No. E (NG) 168.CN-5/2 dated August 3, 1968 and letter No. E (NG) 169 CN 5/31 dated February 19, 1970. The period of one year was later changed to two years. Along with the question of confirmation arose the question of reversion of some of the surplus staff to the steam side from where they were drawn. The Railway Administration issued instructions that the juniormost Firemen Grade 'C' officiating as Diesel Driver Assistant should be reverted in order to accommodate the senior staff. Pursuant to these instructions the appellants all of whom were drawn from the category of Firemen Grade 'C' who had been appointed as officiating Drivers' Assistants were reverted back to the steam side as Firemen Grade 'C' in order to make way for Firemen Grades 'A' and 'B' who were appointed as Drivers' Assistants on the diesel side long after the appointment of the appellants as Drivers' Assistants on the diesel side. Those drawn from the steam side Firemen Grades 'A' and 'B' were not and could not be appointed earlier than the appellants as Drivers' Assistants on the diesel side for the simple reason that at that time only matriculates were being considered for appointment as Drivers' Assistants and these persons did not possess that minimum qualification. It was only as a result of the relaxation of the minimum educational qualification that they became eligible to be appointed. The appellants filed Writ Petitions in the High Court of Allahabad questioning the reversion and claiming that they were entitled to be confirmed as Drivers' Assistants on the diesel side and to all consequential benefits. The Writ Petitions were dismissed by a learned single Judge of the High Court and appeals preferred under the Letters Patent were also dismissed. The present appeals have been filed after obtaining special leave of this Court.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.