EAST INDIA HOUSING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT TRUST LIMITED Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX WEST BENGAL
LAWS(SC)-1960-11-28
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: CALCUTTA)
Decided on November 02,1960

EAST INDIA HOUSING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT TRUST Appellant
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,WEST BENGAL Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI VS. MODI INDUSTRIES LTD [LAWS(DLH)-1994-4-15] [DISTINGUISHED]
CIT DELHI IV NEW DELHI VS. D S PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD [LAWS(DLH)-2009-5-68] [REFERRED TO]
RAMPUR INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(ALL)-1970-8-2] [REFERRED TO]
RAJA JAGDAMBIKA PRATAP NARAIN SINGH VS. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX DEPUTY [LAWS(ALL)-1971-1-38] [REFERRED TO]
P V G RAJU VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(APH)-1966-6-5] [REFERRED TO]
TINSUKIA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(CAL)-1978-3-43] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. KANAIYALAL NIMANI [LAWS(CAL)-1978-12-23] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. CENTRAL STUDIOS P LIMITED [LAWS(MAD)-1972-8-19] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. NATIONAL STORAGE PRIVATE LIMITED [LAWS(BOM)-1962-7-15] [REFERRED TO]
CIT VS. BHOOPALAM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AND INDUSTRIES P LTD [LAWS(KAR)-2003-1-81] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. KOHINOOR TOBACCO PRODUCTS PVT LTD [LAWS(MPH)-2005-2-17] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. MALABAR AND PIONEER HOSIERY PRIVATE LIMITED [LAWS(KER)-1996-2-5] [REFERRED TO]
ATTUKAL SHOPPING COMPLEX PRIVATE LIMITED VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(KER)-2002-10-62] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. NEW INDIA MARITIME AGENCIES P LIMITED [LAWS(MAD)-2001-9-69] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. MODI INDUSTRIES LTD [LAWS(DLH)-1992-8-1] [REFERRED TO (SC) WAS EVEN REFERRED TO. HE ALSO PLACED RELIANCE UPON A DIVISION BENCH DECISION OF THE]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. MODI INDUSTRIES LIMITED [LAWS(DLH)-1994-4-2] [REFERRED TO (SC) : TC 13R.800 AND]
SUDERA ENTERPRISES P LTD VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(CAL)-1989-8-25] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. T P SIDHWA SMT [LAWS(BOM)-1980-12-21] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. INDIAN WAREHOUSING INDUSTRIES LIMITED [LAWS(MAD)-2002-9-252] [REFERRED TO]
Commissioner of Income tax VS. Chennai Properties and Investments Ltd [LAWS(MAD)-2002-9-227] [REFERRED TO]
Commissioner of Income tax VS. Chennai Properties and Investments Ltd [LAWS(MAD)-2003-3-224] [REFERRED TO]
KEYARAM HOTELS P LTD VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(MAD)-2008-1-96] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. RAMDAS AND SONS [LAWS(PAT)-1996-5-34] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. RAMDAS AND SONS [LAWS(PAT)-1998-7-83] [REFERRED TO]
CIT VS. HOTEL RATANADA INTERNATIONAL [LAWS(RAJ)-2007-5-91] [REFERRED TO(SC) ,]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIHAR, PATNA VS. MITHILA PROPERTIES PUBLICATION & CONTRACTOR ENTERPRISES (P) LTD., MUZAFFARPUR : PUJA BAZAR (P) LTD., MUZAFFARPUR : SREE LAL KEJRIWAL ATMARAM KEJRIWAL [LAWS(PAT)-2008-3-66] [REFERRED TO]
S G MERCANTILE CORPN PRIVATE LIMITED VS. G I T CALCUTTA [LAWS(SC)-1972-1-34] [DISTINGUISHED]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MUMBAI VS. D P SANDU BROS CHEMBUR P LTD [LAWS(SC)-2005-1-87] [REFERRED TO]
LAVISH APARTMENT (P) LTD VS. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(DLH)-2012-7-375] [REFERRED TO]
CLOTH TRADERS P LTD VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(GJH)-1983-1-16] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. ALFRED HERBERT INDIA PVT LTD [LAWS(CAL)-1986-2-15] [REFERRED TO]
MADGUL UDYOG VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(CAL)-1989-7-33] [REFERRED TO]
SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENT CO. LTD VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(ALL)-2011-8-218] [REFERRED TO]
AZIMGANJ ESTATE PVT LTD VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(CAL)-2011-9-186] [REFERRED TO]
RAYALA CORPORATION PVT. LTD VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(MAD)-2013-10-12] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. VELANKANI INFORMATION SYSTEMS (P.)LTD. [LAWS(KAR)-2013-4-127] [REFERRED TO]
Commissioner of Income Tax VS. Mysore Intercontinental Hotels (P.) Ltd. [LAWS(KAR)-2010-1-136] [REFERRED TO]
MANGLA HOMES (P) LTD VS. ITO [LAWS(BOM)-2008-8-261] [REFERRED TO]
HARYANA WAREHOUSING CORPORATION VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(P&H)-2008-10-98] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. M/S. BHILAI MANAGEMENT SERVICE PVT. LTD. [LAWS(CHH)-2011-9-77] [REFERRED TO]
KEYARAM HOTELS P. LTD. VS. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(MAD)-2014-11-81] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX­-18 VS. SAMBHAJI NAGAR CO­-OP. HSG. SOCIETY LTD. [LAWS(BOM)-2014-12-94] [REFERRED TO]
DASAPALLA PROPERTIES, SURYABAGH, VISAKHAPATNAM VS. DCIT, CIRCLE I, VISAKHAPATNAM [LAWS(APH)-2014-12-109] [REFERRED TO]
CHENNAI PROPERTIES AND INVEST. LTD. VS. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(SC)-2015-4-98] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I VS. PRAKASH AGNIHOTRI PROP SOCIETY SCHOOTERS [LAWS(ALL)-2014-5-568] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL AND ORS. VS. SUPREME MOTORS LTD. [LAWS(DLH)-2015-9-463] [REFERRED TO]
RAJ DADARKAR & ASSOCIATES VS. ACIT - CC-46 [LAWS(SC)-2017-5-24] [REFERRED TO]
PANDOOI PLACE VS. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 [LAWS(PAT)-2016-11-119] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS. ATMA RAM PROPERTIES (P) LTD. [LAWS(DLH)-2017-9-51] [REFERRED TO]
SKYLAND BUILDERS P LTD VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER [LAWS(DLH)-2020-11-40] [REFERRED TO]
MEERAJ ESTATE AND DEVELOPERS VS. COMMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(ALL)-2019-9-411] [REFERRED TO]
PSTS HEAVY LIFT AND SHIFT LTD. VS. CEEDEEYES IT PARKS PVT. LTD. [LAWS(MAD)-2020-1-606] [REFERRED TO]
PSTS HEAVY LIFT AND SHEET LTD. AND ORS. VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(MAD)-2020-1-619] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

Shah, J. - (1.)This is an appeal with special leave against the judgment of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Calcutta Bench, Calcutta. The appellant is private company registered under the India Companies Act incorporated with the objects, amongst other, (1) to by and develop landed properties and (2) to promote and develop markets. In 1946 the appellant purchased ten bighas of land in the town of Calcutta and set up a market therein. The appellant constructed shops and stalls on platforms on that land. For the assessment year 1953-54 the appellant received Rs. 53,145 as income from the tenants of shops and Rs. 29,721 from the tenants or occupants of stalls. The Income-tax Officer assessed the income derived from shops and stalls under section 9 of the Income Tax Act. The order of assessment was confirmed in appeal by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and by the Tribunal. The appellant has obtained special leave to appeal against the order of the Tribunal.
(2.)The appellant contends that because it is a company formed with the object of promoting and developing markets, its income derived from the shops and stalls is liable to be taxed under section 1o of the Income Tax Act as "profits or gains of business" and that the income is not liable to be taxed as "income from property" under section 9 of the Act. The appellant is undoubtedly, under the provisions of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 required to obtain a licence from the Corporation of Calcutta and to maintain sanitary and other services in conformity with the provisions of that Act and for that Act and for that purpose has to maintain a staff and to incur expenditure. But on that account, the income derived from letting out property belonging to the appellant does not become "profits or gains" from business within the meaning of sections 6 and 1o of the Income Tax Act. By section 6 of the Income Tax Act the following six different heads of income are made charageable : (1) salaries, (2) interest on securities, (3) income from property, (4) profits and gains of business, profession or vocation, (5) income from other sources and (6) capital gains. This classification under distinct heads of income, profits and gains is made having regard to the sources from which income is derived. Income-tax is undoubtedly levied on the total taxable income of the taxpayer and the tax levied is a single tax on the aggregate taxable receipts from all the sources; it is not a collection of taxes separately levied on distinct heads of income. But the distinct heads specified in section 6 indicating the sources are mutually exclusive and income derived from different sources falling under specific heads has to be computed for the purpose to taxation in the manner provided by the appropriate section. If the income from a source falls within a specific head set out in section 6 the fact that it may indirectly be covered by another head will not make the income taxable under the latter head.
(3.)The income derived by the company from shops and stalls is income received from property and falls under the specific head described in section 9. The character of that income is not altered because it is received by a company formed within object of developing and setting up markets. In United Commercial Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income- tax this court explained after an exhaustive review of the authorities that under the scheme of the Income Tax Act, 1922, the heads of income, profits and gains enumerated in the different clauses of section 6 are mutually exclusive, each specific head covering items of income arising from a particular source.
;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.