STATE OF BOMBAY Vs. AUTOMOBILE AND AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION BOMBAY
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
STATE OF BOMBAY
AUTOMOBILE AND AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION,BOMBAY
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.)Under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953' which replaced re-enacted the Bombay Sales Tax Ordinance No. II of 1952, the aden's held a licence under section 12 as dealers, but they did not or themselves under section 9 even though they were liable to pay at tax as well as special tax as dealers in commodities set out in lie II of the Act. By section 5, a dealer whose turnover exceeded life amount was required to pay in addition to the special tax, ell tax at the rates specified in section 6, Ss. (I). By 9, a dealer who is liable to pay general tax could not carry on as a dealer unless he had applied for registration within the prescribed by the Act. Every dealer whose turnover in respect cal goods described in Schedule II to the Act exceeded then, specified as liable to pay special tax at rates set out in column (2) of Schedule 11. By section 12, a dealer liable to pay special could not carry on business as such dealer unless he had applied licence within the period prescribed. The material parts of section Ss. (2) and (4) provided :
"(2) No person selling any goods shall collect from the pure any amount by way of tax unless he is a registered dealer licensed dealer and is liable to pay the tax under this Act in reps such sale:
(2.)By section 36, carrying on business as a dealer without app for registration or obtaining a licence in contravention of S. 12 was made punishable.
(3.)The respondents carried on business as dealers in special god and they were liable to pay general tax as well as special tax for period of assessment November i, 1952, to 31/03/1954 fox period of assessment in question, the respondents submitted sepia returns for special and general tax. The Sales Tax Officer on discoing that the appellants had not applied for a registration certified under section 9 of the Act, ordered that for contravention of sub-se (2) of section 21 the general tax collected by the respondent forfeited. The order passed by the Sales Tax Officer was confirmed the Assistant Collector of Sales Tax and the Additional Collect Sales Tax. But the Sales Tax tribunal, Bombay, set aside the passed by the taxing authority. The State of Bombay has with sp leave appealed to this court against the order of the Sales Tax tribunal.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.