V VR N M SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MADRAS
LAWS(SC)-1950-12-2
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: MADRAS)
Decided on December 21,1950

V.VR.N.M.SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR Appellant
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) This is an appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Madras on a reference made to it under S. 66 (1), Income-tax Act, by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in connection with the assessment of the appellant to income-tax for the year 1942-43. The question of law referred to the High Court was as follows : "Whether in the circumstances of the case, the assessee (a Hindu undivided family) is 'resident' in British India under S. 4A (b), Income-tax Act."
(2.) The circumstances of the case may be briefly stated as follows. The appellant is the karta of a joint Hindu family and has been living in Ceylon with his wife, son and three daughters, and they are stated to be domiciled in that country. He carries on business in Colombo under the name and style of the General Trading Corporation, and he owns a house, some immovable property and investments in British India. He has also shares in two firms situated at Vijayapuram and Nagapatnam in British India. In the year of account, 1941-42, which is the basis of the present assessment, the appellant is said to have visited British India on seven occasions and the total period of his stay in British India was 101 days. What he did during this period is summarized in the judgment of one of the learned Judges of the High Court in these words : "During such stays, he personally attended to a litigation relating to the family lands both in the trial Court and in the Court of appeal. He was also attending the income-tax proceedings relating to the assessment of the family income, appearing before the Income-tax authorities at Karaikudi and Madras. On one of these occasions, he obtained an extension of time for payment of the tax after interviewing the authority concerned... . ."
(3.) The other facts relied upon by the income-tax authorities were that he did not produce the file of correspondence with the business in Colombo so as to help them in determining whether the management and control of the business was situated in Colombo and he had started two partnership businesses in India on 25-2-1942 and remained in India for some time after the commencement of those businesses.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.