MUKUL AGRAWAL Vs. STATE OF U.P.
LAWS(SC)-2020-2-21
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on February 10,2020

Mukul Agrawal Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

SUKESH N. VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2021-7-129] [REFERRED TO]
SATISH BADAYA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2021-2-239] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

NAVIN SINHA,J. - (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)The appellants are aggrieved by order dated 21.05.2019 dismissing their application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. declining to quash the entire proceedings against them in Complaint Case No.2705/2003 filed by the respondent no.2 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, I.P.C.
(3.)The order of the High Court unfortunately only discusses the principles for quashing laid down in judicial precedents and abruptly concludes to decline interference. The order does not reflect any consideration of the facts, the materials and the reasons why the High Court was not persuaded to entertain the application. We are therefore deprived of the understanding for the reasons why the High Court did not consider it a fit case for interference. Needless to state, any order which is amenable to challenge in a superior court, has to be reasoned and speaking to facilitate better understanding of the order making judicial review an effective exercise.
;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.