ILANGOVAN Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU
LAWS(SC)-2020-9-49
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on September 02,2020

ILANGOVAN Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF TAMIL NADU Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

RAM VIJAY SINGH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [LAWS(SC)-2021-2-68] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U.P. VS. PHOOL SINGH [LAWS(ALL)-2022-3-8] [REFERRED TO]
SHAHAB ALAM VS. STATE OF U. P. [LAWS(ALL)-2021-1-136] [REFERRED TO]
SURENDRAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(SC)-2022-5-61] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

N.V.RAMANA,J. - (1.)The present appeal is directed against the Judgment dated 06.01.2010 passed by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court whereby the appellant-accused's appeal was partly allowed and his conviction under Section 302, IPC was modified into one under Section 304 Part II, IPC and sentence was reduced to 5 years' rigorous imprisonment along with fine. The conviction and sentence imposed upon the appellant under Section 324, IPC was confirmed by the High Court and both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
(2.)The facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows: the brother of the complainant allegedly had an illicit relationship with the daughter of accused no. 4, which resulted in enmity between the two families. On 26.01.2002, the accused persons allegedly came in front of the house of the complainant and a fight took place between the two groups. The present appellant attacked the complainant with an iron rod, while the other 3 accused allegedly attacked other members of the family with sticks. The deceased, on hearing the noise, attempted to intervene, and was attacked by the present appellant on the head with the iron rod, which ultimately resulted in her death.
(3.)The Trial Court convicted the appellant under Sections 324 and 302, IPC and sentenced him to 2 years rigorous imprisonment and imprisonment for life, respectively. The other accused were acquitted as the charges against them were not proved beyond reasonable doubt. On appeal, as mentioned above, the High Court modified the conviction under Section 302, IPC, and sentence imposed thereunder, to one under Section 304 Part II, IPC, on the ground that the case of the appellant fell under Exception 4 to Section 300, IPC, that is, there was a free fight between the two parties.
;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.