JUDGEMENT
HEMANT GUPTA,J. -
(1.) The State is aggrieved against an order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh on 2nd May, 2016 whereby the proceedings
against the respondents, both sons of late Manohar Singh Jadon,
for an offence under Sections 420, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code,
1860 (for short, 'IPC') were quashed.
(2.) A charge sheet for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 409, 120B IPC and 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, 'Act') was filed on 9th July, 2008 consequent to registration of
FIR No. 3 of 2007 on 23 rd June, 2007. The allegation was that
Manohar Singh Jadon, deceased father of the respondents in
connivance with other employees of District Cooperative Kendriya
Bank Maryadit, Shajapur (for short, 'Bank') committed financial irregularities on the
basis of forged documents by misusing his post and by providing
fake loan to the relatives. Manohar Singh Jadon was President of
the Bank from 5th February, 1997 to 26th March, 2002 and from 27 th
March, 2002 to 7th May, 2004. Harshvardhan Singh Jadon
(accused-respondent No. 2) is the proprietor of M/s. Harshvardhan
& Brothers whereas Yogendra Singh (accused-respondent No. 1) is
the proprietor of M/s. Sarohar Trading Company. Ghanshyam
Sharma, General Manager, Ramanlal Acharya, Manager, Ram Singh
Yadav, General Manager were also arrayed as accused. It was
alleged that accused Harshvardhan Singh Jadon submitted an
application on 2nd November, 2000 for grant of cash credit limit of
Rs.25 lakhs and that the cash credit limit was sanctioned without
following the due procedure. It was also alleged that mortgage
deed was not registered nor signature of original loanee was found
on the mortgage paper. It is also pointed out that an amount of
Rs.59,88,327/- was balance on 1st December, 2001 even after
depositing Rs.25 lakhs and that the President has done the renewal
of cash credit limit at his own level and its confirmation was got
done later on from the loan Sub-Committee, while the case was of
the son of the President alone. In respect of Yogendra Singh, again
the allegation is that cash credit limit of Rs.25 lakhs was
sanctioned on the basis of his application dated 30 th July, 2001
without completing any of the procedural requirements and
without mortgage of any of the property. Smt. Saroj Singh
mortgaged the land but without any valuation. The surety of
Ishwar Singh was taken. The same person mortgaged land as in
the case of Harshvardhan. Similar is the assertion in respect of
registration of mortgage. It was also alleged that a sum of
Rs.25,65,894/- is the balance as on 31st March, 2002 even after
withdrawal beyond the approved credit limit of Rs.25 lakhs.
(3.) The Special Judge passed an order of framing of charges against Harshvardhan Singh Jadon and Yogendra Singh Jadon apart from
other accused on 24th February, 2014. Such order was challenged
by the respondents by way of a criminal revision.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.