JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The question which arises for consideration in these appeals is
whether the provisions contained in Sections 24, 24A and 26 of the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (for short, 'the Act') operate as a bar
against the prosecution of a person who is charged with the allegations
which constitute an offence or offences under other laws including the
Indian Penal Code (IPC).
(3.) Respondent, Vimal Kumar Surana, who is a graduate in Commerce
and has passed the examination of Chartered Accountant but is not a
member of the appellant-Institute is alleged to have represented himself
before the Income Tax Department and the authorities constituted under the
Madhya Pradesh Trade Tax Act on the basis of power of attorney or as legal
representative and submitted documents such as audit reports and
certificates required to be issued by the Chartered Accountants by preparing
forged seals. He is also said to have impersonated himself as Chartered
Accountant and prepared audit reports for monetary consideration.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.