C N SUBRAMANIAM Vs. TATA SHARE REGISTRY LTD
LAWS(NCD)-1997-1-124
NCDRC
Decided on January 29,1997

C N SUBRAMANIAM Appellant
VERSUS
TATA SHARE REGISTRY LTD Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Brief facts of the case are that the complainant held 494 shares of Tata Chemicals Limited. He had urgent need for money. He, therefore, sold the shares to M/s. Bharat Investments, OP 2, through a sub- broker and acquaintance of the complainant one Mr. K. K. Malhotra, arrayed as OP 3, on 24.9.93 for Rs.1,50,487.10. Contract Notes No.108 to 110 were executed. The share certificates were delivered alongwith duly signed transfer deeds. OP 2 issued three cheques of Rs.50,000/- each dated 7.11.93 in favour of the complainant on account of price of the shares sold. The complainant had already paid Rs.3.000/- as brokerage. The cheques were dishonoured by the Bank in November and December, 93. The complainant issued a legal notice dated 14.12.93 and filed the present complaint on 16.6.94 claiming Rs.5,31,971.19 as per details mentioned at page 5 of the complaint. The amount included Rs.1,50,487.10 on account of price of the shares, Rs.1,00,000/- on account of difference in the price of the shares at the time of sale and at the time of institution of the complaint, Rs.31.484/- as interest @ 21% and Rs.2,50,000/- on account of financial loss and damages incurred by the complainant. Arrayed in the complaint besides the purchaser and the sub-broker was Tata Share Registry Limited, a unit of Tata Chemicals Ltd. to whom OP 2 had sent the shares for transfer in favour of the vendees.
(2.)Mr. K. K. Malhotra, OP 3, appeared and filed his written version. None appeared on behalf of either OP 1 i. e. Tata Share Registry Ltd. or OP 2 i. e. Bharat Investments or the proprietor thereof, Mr. Bharat Bhushan.
(3.)In the written statement filed by Mr. K. K. Malhotra, OP 3, the material averments were admitted. It was, however, denied that he is a sub-broker. In other words, OP 3 supported the complainant's case. The complainant filed his own affidavit as well as placed on record copies of delivery bills dated 24.9.93 bearing S. Nos.108 to 110, photo copies of three cheques of Rs.50,000/- each dated 7.11.93 issued by Bharat Bhushan on behalf of Bharat Investments, OP 2, the intimation of the Bank of Baroda regarding dishonour of the cheques. No evidence has been placed on record on behalf of any of the OPs.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.