R P PUSHKAR Vs. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 30.8.2013 passed by the U.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Lucknow (in short, 'the State Commission') in Appeal No. 106 of 2012 G.D.A. Vs. R.P. Purshar and Ors. by which, while allowing revision petition, order of District Forum passed in execution proceedings was set aside.

(2.) BRIEF facts of the case are that Complainant/Petitioner filed complaint before District forum and District Forum allowed complaint and directed OP/respondent to handover possession of the plot and pay interest and cost. Appeal filed by OP was decided by learned State Commission vide order dated 6.8.2001 by which, OP was directed to pay interest @ 18% p.a. with Rs.2,000/ - as cost. OP filed revision petition before this Commission and this Commission vide order dated 18.3.2011 directed OP to execute lease deed of the plot on completion of due formalities within a period of 4 weeks. As lease deed was not executed within 4 weeks, complainant filed execution petition before District Forum and learned District Forum awarded Rs.25,000/ - as compensation for delayed execution of deed on 9.1.2012. This order was challenged by OP before State Commission and learned State Commission vide impugned order while allowing revision petition set aside compensation of Rs.25,000/ - against which, this revision petition has been filed.

(3.) HEARD petitioner in person and perused record.