EXECUTIVE OFFICER Vs. RAVINDRAN
TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Click here to view full judgement.
M. THANIKACHALAM J. -
(1.) The respondent in this appeal, as complainant approached the District
Forum, as if Andipatti Special Village Panchayat has committed deficiency
in service, since it failed to rectify the water taps, thereby causing
mental agony, for which appropriate direction should be issued.
(2.) The opposite party, though served, failed to appear before the court,
and without knowing what could be the defense of the opposite party,
purely based upon the averments in the complaint alone, a direction came
to be issued, as seen from the order dt.29.12.2006, directing the
opposite party, that they should rectify the water pipes, in addition
granting a sum of Rs.5000/- as compensation, alongwith cost of Rs.5000/-,
with interest, which is under challenge.
(3.) Heard the learned counsels appearing on either side, perused the lower
court records, as well as order passed by the District forum.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.