MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA FINANCE COMPANY Vs. A. VIJAYASINGAM, PRESIDENT
TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Click here to view full judgement.
M. THANIKACHALAM J. -
(1.) The opposite party is the appellant.
(2.) The 2nd respondent/ 2nd complainant, had purchased a Mahindra Champion
Auto, manufactured by Mahindra and Mahindra, from its dealer SJP Motors,
on 23.6.2005, for which this opposite party financed. The user of the
vehicle, by the 2nd complainant, proved to be not worthy, since it had
manufacturing defect, causing other related problems. Because of the
problems, since it was not rectified, the complainant felt there was
deficiency in service, and therefore, he has filed the case against the
financier alone, for the recovery of a sum of Rs.2,81,320/-, representing
the value of the vehicle, payment made by the 2nd complainant, repair
charges of Rs.4000/-, in addition to a sum of Rs.50000/-, for mental
agony, as if this monetary loss had occurred to him, by the act of the
(3.) The opposite party/ appellant, though received notice, unfortunately
failed to appear before the District Forum, and contested the case.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.