GOVERNMENT BANGLADESH Vs. ATM MOSTAFA RASHED
LAWS(BANG)-2009-2-5
SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH
Decided on February 16,2009

Government Bangladesh Appellant
VERSUS
Atm Mostafa Rashed Respondents

JUDGEMENT

MOHAMMAD FAZLUL KARIM,J. - (1.) This petition for Leave to Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 09.07.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.7252 of 2006 making the Rule absolute.
(2.) The writ-petitioner No.1 is the principal of the Islamia Nesaria Senior (Alim) Madrasha and he was initially appointed in the post of Assistant Moulana and accordingly joined in the Madrasha on 08.09. 88 and the petitioner No.2 as a lecturer, political science on 15.02.2002 and got their name enrolled in the M.P.O issued by the BANBBIS and have been receiving the partition of the salary granted by the Government duly and regularly. The writ-petitioners while rendering their service to the utmost satisfaction all concerns were informed of an office order dated 04.08.2002 issued by the respondent No. 3 to withhold the payment of Government portion of the salary of the writ petitioners from 01.06.2002. The writ respondent No.2 forwarded a letter to the writ-petitioner intimating on 28.03.2006 that their prayer for releasing the Government portion of their salary could not be considered and thereby dismissed their appeal with reference to [xxx xxx xxx]without assigning any cogent and reason and writ-petitioner challenging the aforesaid order Filed the said writ petition before the High Court Division.
(3.) Mr. Md. Zahirul Islam, learned Advocate-on-Record, appearing for the petitioner submitted that regarding appointment of the respondents by an illegal Managing Committee was questioned and to find out the fact an inquiry was held by the District Education officer, Patuakhali. The inquiry report was submitted on 10.06.2002 in holding that the appointment of the petitioner by the committee being is illegal and the office of petitioner Nos.2 and 3 rightly stopped the payment of Government portion of the salary of the respondent Nos. 1-3; that the High Court Division did not consider whether the appointment was illegal or legal, rather, treating the appointment as legal made the rule absolute with direction to release the stopped salary and allowance. The learned Advocate Further submitted that the Title Suit No.254 of 2001 is pending before the Assistant Judge, Patuakhali regarding the question of illegitimate committee which requires determination of disputed question of fact on evidence in the High Court Division ought to have discharged the Rule.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.