JIWAN KUMAR PRADHAN Vs. KEDARNATH PRADHAN
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
Jiwan Kumar Pradhan
Click here to view full judgement.
Arup Kumar Goswami,J. -
(1.)Heard Mr. Zangpo Sherpa, learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. T.R Barfungpa, learned Counsel for respondent no.1. Also heard Ms. Mukun Dolma Tamang, learned Assistant Government Advocate for respondent no.2.
(2.)I.A No.06 of 2020 was filed by the respondent no.1 stating that Title Suit No.16 of 2015, filed by the petitioner, was dismissed by the learned District Judge, Special Division-I, Gangtok by Judgment dated 27.03.2018. He submits that challenge in the Writ Petition was, amongst others, to an order releasing land acquisition compensation amount to the respondent no.1, and the claim made by the petitioner in Title Suit No.16 of 2015 that the land acquired was part of the ancestral property having been negated, nothing survives for consideration and the Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous.
(3.)Mr. Sherpa also submits that in view of the developments as indicated in the I.A No.06 of 2020, the Writ Petition has been rendered infructous.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.