(1.) This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by original petitioner, being aggrieved and feeling dissatisfied by the judgment and order delivered by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 1619 of 2012 dated 8th July 2015, whereby the petition preferred by this appellant has been dismissed and, hence, the original petitioner has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal. Original petitioner (this appellant) is claiming right of pre - emption i.e. to purchase the property of his neighbour. This claim is raised, after several years, after which his neighbour (Respondent No. 7) sold away the property.
(2.) FACTUAL MATRIX
(3.) ARGUMENT CANVASSED BY THE COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT (ORIGINAL PETITIONER).