SAVITRI DEVI Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Saurav Arun, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2. No body appears on behalf of the opposite party no. 3.

(2.) THIS application is directed against the order dated 25.11.2003 passed by Smt. M.J. Tigga, learned Executive Magistrate, Sadar, Hazaribagh in Case No. M. 369 of 1991 arising out T.R. No. 317 of 2003 directing the parties to produce their evidences.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner, in reply, submitted that the petitioner appeared in the proceedings in question in the year 1997, i.e. much after filing of the suit, on the basis of the order passed by this Court. Moreover, in the proceeding in question the evidences were already closed and, therefore, in any event, the learned Magistrate should not have ordered for producing the witnesses afresh.