BINOD KUMAR CHIRANIA Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS application has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 5.4.2003, whereby and whereunder, the learned Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi rejected the petitioner 'scase for his discharge for the offence under Sections 120 -B, 409, 420, 467, 460, 471 and 477 -A of Indian Penal Code and under Sec.13(a) (c) and (d) of the PC Act in connection with CBI, RC Case No. 50 (A)/96.

(2.) ACCORDING to the petitioner, after investigation, the allegation levelled is that the Company, namely, Trade Well (India) Pvt. Ltd. of which the petitioner was a Director which supplied medicines received payment of Rs. 3,99,680.00 whereas the actual supply made by him is only Rs. 2,76,504 / - and a sum of Rs. 1,23,176/ -has been described as fictitious supply. They only allegation levelled against the petitioner is that the Company was represented by the petitioner in the capacity of Director. Further, according to petitioner, the text of allegation and the materials on record as collected during investigation show that no specific allegation made against him. He has been falsely implicated in the case and has been shown accused in the charge -sheet submitted by the I. O. on account of his personal bias against him after the petitioner lodged a complaint before the Joint Director (East), CBI. Except the allegation against the Company, no direct allegation has been levelled against him.

(3.) IN the facts and circumstances, no relief can be granted as sought for by the petitioner.