AJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN both the cases, common issues are involved. With the consent of the parties, the said cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this order.

(2.) THE petitioners, in both the cases, are aggrieved by the office order dated 05.12.2011(Annexure - 8), whereby the petitioners' pay scale has been reduced to Rs.1200 -2040/ - on the ground that they acquired qualification of training after 31.12.1985. They are also aggrieved by withholding of their salary since October,2011.

(3.) AGGRIEVED by the said order, the petitioners and other filed writ application C.W.J.C. no.2974 of 1999(R). In the said writ application, while issuing notice to the respondents, interim order was passed staying the operation of the letter dated 1.9.1999. The petitioners continued to get salary on the said scale. In the meantime, the State Government adopted the recommendation of VI Pay Revision and the petitioners' pay was revised and their pay scale was replaced by Rs.9300 - 34800/ - in Pay Band(PB -II). The said fixation of pay was approved by the District Accounts Officer, East Singhbhum. The writ application filed by the petitioners was disposed of by order dated 30.04.2009 allowing the petitioners to file representation before the appropriate Forum. The petitioners and others filed representations. The representations were placed before the District Education Establishment Committee in the meeting held on 14.05.2010. The said Committee decided to constitute a Screening Committee. The Screening Committee recommended for canceling the trained graduate scale of such candidates, who acquired training after 31.12.1985. The District Education Establishment Committee accepted the said recommendation in its meeting dated 17.11.2011. The respondent no.4 on the basis of the said resolution directed the Headmasters of the Schools to implement the said order and to fix pay scale in the light of the order dated 5.12.2011(Annexure -8) and to call upon the teachers to submit their service books before such entry. In view of the said order, the petitioners were not paid their salary since October, 2011.