INDRADEO RAM Vs. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present petition has been preferred mainly for the reason that the petitioner has not been selected for L.P.G. distributorship by the Interview Committee, constituted by the respondents

(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not been given L.P.G. distributorship though the petitioner is an eligible candidate for appointment as a distributor. Other similarly situated candidates have been given L.P.G. distributorship, but, the petitioner's case has not been considered by the Screening Committee, constituted by the respondents. The petitioner has appeared before the Interview Committee at Jamshedpur. The result of the interview has also not been published. There was also re-interview of certain candidates and as per the bifurcation of marks, as stated in paragraph 16 of the memo of the petition, the petitioner has secured enough marks for grant of L.P.G. distributorship, therefore, the respondents may be directed to grant L.P.G. distributorship to the petitioner.