KOTHANDARAMAPPA Vs. SUBBANNA
LAWS(PVC)-1900-4-4
PRIVY COUNCIL
Decided on April 11,1900

KOTHANDARAMAPPA Appellant
VERSUS
SUBBANNA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Shephard, J - (1.) I cannot understand how it can he said that two distinct trespass as committed at different times on different parts of the same plot of land can be regarded as giving one cause of action only. The case of Jumoona Dassee Chowdranee V/s. Ramasoonderee Dassee Ghowdranee no doubt supports the contention of the respondents. On the other hand, the decision in Court of Wards V/s. Rajah Leelanand Singh Bahadur 2 supports the contrary view. It may be that the plaintiff might have so framed his action as to have made it obligatory on him to claim all the land which was wrongfully withheld. But I cannot, in the circumstances, say that he was bound to do so.
(2.) We must reverse the decree of the Lower Appellate Court and remand the appeal. The respondents must pay the costs of this appeal for appellant. Davies, J.
(3.) I see no reason to differ.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.